Legal Theory 25 (3):178-199 (2019)

Authors
Levi Spectre
Open University of Israel
David Enoch
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Abstract
ABSTRACTIn a recent paper, Michael Pardo argues that the epistemic property that is legally relevant is the one called Safety, rather than Sensitivity. In the process, he argues against our Sensitivity-related account of statistical evidence. Here we revisit these issues, partly in order to respond to Pardo, and partly in order to make general claims about legal epistemology. We clarify our account, we show how it adequately deals with counterexamples and other worries, we raise suspicions about Safety's value here, and we revisit our general skepticism about the role that epistemological considerations should play in determining legal policy.
Keywords Statistical evidence  safety  sensitivity
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s1352325219000120
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Solving the Skeptical Problem.Keith DeRose - 1995 - Philosophical Review 104 (1):1-52.
Reponses to Critics.Timothy Williamson - 2009 - In Patrick Greenough & Duncan Pritchard (eds.), Williamson on Knowledge. Oxford University Press.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Recent Work on the Proof Paradox.Lewis D. Ross - 2020 - Philosophy Compass 15 (6).

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Sensitivity, Safety, and Closure.Sven Bernecker - 2012 - Acta Analytica 27 (4):367-381.
Subjunctivitis.Jonathan Vogel - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 134 (1):73 - 88.
Sensitivity Actually.Michael Blome-Tillmann - 2017 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 94 (3):606-625.
What Shifts Epistemic Standards? DeRose on Contextualism, Safety, and Sensitivity.Michael Blome-Tillmann - forthcoming - International Journal for the Study of Skepticism:1-7.
Do Safety Failures Preclude Knowledge?J. R. Fett - 2018 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 22 (2):301-319.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-10-01

Total views
113 ( #79,319 of 2,326,559 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
38 ( #16,690 of 2,326,559 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes