Taking Morality Seriously: A Defense of Robust Realism

Oxford University Press UK (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

David Enoch develops, argues for, and defends a strongly realist and objectivist view of ethics and normativity more broadly. This view--according to which there are perfectly objective, universal, moral and other normative truths that are not in any way reducible to other, natural truths--is familiar, but this book is the first in-detail development of the positive motivations for the view into reasonably precise arguments. And when the book turns to defend Robust Realism against traditional objections, it mobilizes the original positive arguments for the view to help with fending off the objections.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,400

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Chapters

Epistemology

A common objection to realism (robust or otherwise) is that realists owe us — very roughly speaking — an account of how it is that we can have epistemic access to the normative truths about which they are realists. This chapter first distinguishes between many different ways of understandi... see more

Disagreement

Moral disagreement is widely held to pose a threat for metaethical realism and objectivity. This chapter is an attempt at understanding how it is that moral disagreement is supposed to present a problem for metaethical and meta-normative realism. The chapter distinguishes between many diff... see more

Similar books and articles

An argument for robust metanormative realism.David Enoch - 2003 - Dissertation, New York University
Robust moral realism: an excellent religion.David Killoren - 2016 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 79 (3):223-237.
Disagreeing about how to disagree.Kate Manne & David Sobel - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 168 (3):823-34.
Against quietist normative realism.Tristram McPherson - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 154 (2):223-240.
God and Moral Realism.Katherin Rogers - 2005 - International Philosophical Quarterly 45 (1):103-118.
Rationality and moral realism.Nick Zangwill - 2012 - Ratio 25 (3):345-364.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-03-20

Downloads
428 (#25,976)

6 months
20 (#55,655)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Enoch
Hebrew University of Jerusalem

Citations of this work

Moral Error Theory: History, Critique, Defence.Jonas Olson - 2014 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Evolutionary Debunking of Moral Realism.Katia Vavova - 2015 - Philosophy Compass 10 (2):104-116.
Real Definition.Gideon Rosen - 2015 - Analytic Philosophy 56 (3):189-209.
Conceptual Ethics I.Alexis Burgess & David Plunkett - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (12):1091-1101.

View all 336 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references