Law and Philosophy 30 (3):273-290 (2011)
Doctrinally, a precedent is a case of the same or higher court that furnishes an authoritative rule for the determination of the case at hand, either because the facts are alike, or, if the facts are different, because the principle that governed the first case is applicable to the different facts. In this article I try to free precedent form the dominant doctrinal view by offering a more intuitive conception: that to be precedent means to be treated as precedent. Put differently, I attempt to see precedent not as descriptive of a previous decision or rule but as the aggregate effect of responses to one or a series of court decisions in the legal community. I illustrate this viewpoint by developing a version of a response-dependent concept that incorporates our intuitive grasp of how precedent works. In the pursuit of this task I rely on the basic philosophical premises of response-dependence theory and on one paradigmatic response-dependent concept—the quality of being funny
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
An Ethical Evaluation of the Supreme Court Decision Regarding ERISA Interpretation.Kristin Lefebvre - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Research 32 (Supplement):327-334.
A Theory of Precedent: From Analytical Positivism to a Post-Analytical Philosophy of Law.Raimo Siltala - 2000 - Hart.
Schauer on Precedent in the U.S. Supreme Court.William A. Edmundson - 2007 - Georgia State University Law Review 24 (2):403-13.
A Reduction-Graph Model of Precedent in Legal Analysis.L. Karl Branting - 2003 - Artificial Intelligence 150 (1-2):59-95.
How (Not) to Specify Normal Conditions for Response-Dependent Concepts.Jussi Haukioja - 2007 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85 (2):325 – 331.
The Strategic Content Model of Supreme Court Opinion Writing.Yonatan Lupu & James H. Fowler - unknown
When the Dissent Creates the Law: Cross-Cutting Majorities and the Prediction Model of Precedent.Michael L. Eber - manuscript
Response-Dependence About Aesthetic Value.Michael Watkins & James Shelley - 2012 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 93 (3):338-352.
Pragmatism and Precedent: A Response to Dworkin.Michael Sullivan - 1990 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 26 (2):225 - 248.
Acceptance-Dependence: A Social Kind of Response-Dependence.Frank A. Hindriks - 2006 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87 (4):481–498.
Precedent Autonomy and Subsequent Consent.John K. Davis - 2004 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 7 (3):267-291.
Added to index2011-02-13
Total downloads112 ( #43,632 of 2,163,981 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #348,017 of 2,163,981 )
How can I increase my downloads?