Critique of Moral Judgment: Sociology Versus Neuroscience


Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/21507740.2011.559916
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 42,993
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Neuroethics: A New Way of Doing Ethics.Neil Levy - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 2 (2):3-9.
New Essays on Human Understanding.G. W. LEIBNIZ - 1981 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 45 (3):489-490.
Ethics and Experts.Cheryl N. Noble - 1982 - Hastings Center Report 12 (3):7-15.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Neuroethics: A New Way of Doing Ethics”.Neil Levy - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 2 (2):W1-W4.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Necessity of Moral Reasoning.Leland Saunders - 2018 - Journal of Value Inquiry 52 (1):37-57.
Causation in Moral Judgment.Michael Kurak - 2011 - Mind and Matter 9 (2):153-170.
Beyond Moral Judgment.Alice Crary - 2007 - Harvard University Press.
Kant and the Problem of Practical Judgment.Shawn Daniel Kaplan - 2000 - Dissertation, New School for Social Research

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-06-22

Total views
10 ( #718,919 of 2,259,536 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #134,859 of 2,259,536 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature