Environmental Ethics 39 (2):131-146 (2017)
Authors | |
Abstract |
Developing a way to address troublesome issues in areas such as urban planning is a chal-lenging undertaking. It includes making decisions that involve humans, nonhumans, future generations, and historical and cultural artifacts. All of these groups deserve consideration, but not equally. Figuring out how to approach this topic involves overcoming the problem of moral prioritization. The structure of weak anthropocentrism can help with this problem, suggesting that future research on the environmental aspects of metropolitan regions should make use of its applicability. Despite its strengths, weak anthropocentrism must be expanded to address complicated urban issues. A multitiered weak-anthropocentric measure, a “complex moral assessment,” is needed to address these concerns.
|
Keywords | Applied Philosophy Contemporary Philosophy General Interest Social and Political Philosophy |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | 0163-4275 |
DOI | 10.5840/enviroethics201712146 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Automated Vehicles and Transportation Justice.Shane Epting - 2019 - Philosophy and Technology 32 (3):389-403.
Re-Envisioning the Nocturnal Sublime: On the Ethics and Aesthetics of Nighttime Lighting.Taylor Stone - 2018 - Topoi 40 (2):481-491.
Is Environmental Virtue Ethics Anthropocentric?Dominika Dzwonkowska - 2018 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 31 (6):723-738.
Anthropocentrism as the Scapegoat of the Environmental Crisis: A Review.L. Droz - 2022 - Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics 22:25-49.
Similar books and articles
Environmental Ethics and Weak Anthropocentrism.Bryan G. Norton - 1984 - Environmental Ethics 6 (2):131-148.
A Different Trolley Problem: The Limits of Environmental Justice and the Promise of Complex Moral Assessments for Transportation Infrastructure.Shane Epting - 2016 - Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (6):1781-1795.
A Critique of the Moral Defense of Vegetarianism. [REVIEW]Kathie Jenni - 2017 - Environmental Ethics 39 (1):121-124.
Mark Coeckelbergh. Growing Moral Relations: Critique of Moral Status Ascription. [REVIEW]Frank Jankunis - 2013 - Environmental Philosophy 10 (2):116-119.
The Case for Casuistry in Environmental Ethics.Debra J. Erickson - 2016 - Environmental Ethics 38 (3):287-305.
Naturalizing Sentimentalism for Environmental Ethics.T. J. Kasperbauer - 2015 - Environmental Ethics 37 (2):221-237.
Environmental Philosophy and the Shaping of Public Policy.Robert Frodeman - 2004 - Environmental Philosophy 1 (1):6-12.
Elizabeth Cripps: Climate Change and the Moral Agent: Individual Duties in an Interdependent World.Christopher Groves - 2015 - Environmental Ethics 37 (2):247-248.
Moral Pluralism, Skillful Means, and Environmental Ethics.William Edelglass - 2006 - Environmental Philosophy 3 (2):8-16.
The Virtue of Burden and Limits of Gelassenheit.Brendan Mahoney - 2016 - Environmental Philosophy 13 (2):269-298.
Mark Coeckelbergh: Environmental Skill: Motivation, Knowledge, and the Possibility of a Non-Romantic Environmental Ethics.Louke van Wensveen - 2015 - Environmental Ethics 37 (3):379-380.
Moral Pluralism and the Course of Environmental Ethics.Christopher D. Stone - 1988 - Environmental Ethics 10 (2):139-154.
Rhuks Ako: Environmental Justice in Developing Countries: Perspectives From Africa and Asia-Pacific. [REVIEW]Joseph A. Tuminello Iii - 2015 - Environmental Ethics 37 (3):381-382.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2017-12-20
Total views
18 ( #605,456 of 2,499,299 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #418,195 of 2,499,299 )
2017-12-20
Total views
18 ( #605,456 of 2,499,299 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #418,195 of 2,499,299 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads