Breaking the law: Promoting domain-specificity in chemical education in the context of arguing about the periodic law [Book Review]

Foundations of Chemistry 9 (3):247-263 (2007)

In this paper, domain-specificity is presented as an understudied problem in chemical education. This argument is unpacked by drawing from two bodies of literature: learning of science and epistemology of science, both themes that have cognitive as well as philosophical undertones. The wider context is students’ engagement in scientific inquiry, an important goal for science education and one that has not been well executed in everyday classrooms. The focus on science learning illustrates the role of domain specificity in scientific reasoning. The discussion on epistemology of science presents ideas from the emerging field of philosophy of chemistry to highlight the much neglected area of epistemology in chemical education. Domain-specificity is exemplified in the context of chemical laws, in particular the Periodic Law. The applications of the discussion for chemical education are explored in relation to argumentation, itself an epistemologically grounded discourse pattern in science. The overall implications include the need for reconceptualization of the nature of teaching and learning in chemistry to include more particular epistemological aspects of chemistry.
Keywords Domain-specificity  Argumentation  Chemical laws  Periodicity
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10698-007-9036-z
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 45,434
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

How the Laws of Physics Lie.Nancy Cartwright - 1983 - Oxford University Press.
Conceptual Revolutions.Paul THAGARD - 1992 - Princeton University Press.

View all 26 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Why Take Chemistry Stoically? The Case of Posidonius.Ernesto Paparazzo - 2008 - Foundations of Chemistry 10 (1):63-75.
Innateness and Domain-Specificity.Muhammad Ali Khalidi - 2001 - Philosophical Studies 105 (2):191-210.
Mathematical Aspects of the Periodic Law.Guillermo Restrepo & Leonardo Pachón - 2007 - Foundations of Chemistry 9 (2):189-214.


Added to PP index

Total views
40 ( #220,592 of 2,280,270 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #149,100 of 2,280,270 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature