Philosophy of Science 69 (S3):S305-S315 (2002)

Authors
Marc Ereshefsky
University of Calgary
Abstract
We tend to think that there are different types of biological taxa: some taxa are species, others are genera, while others are families. Linnaeus gave us his ranks in 1731. Biological theory has changed since Linnaeus’s time. Nevertheless, the vast majority of biologists still assign Linnaean ranks to taxa, even though that practice is at odds with evolutionary theory and even though it causes a number of practical problems. The Linnaean ranks should be abandoned and alternative methods for displaying the hierarchical relations of taxa should be adopted.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/341854
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,388
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Phylogenetic Systematics.Willi Hennig - 1966 - University of Illinois Press.
The Cladistic Solution to the Species Problem.Mark Ridley - 1989 - Biology and Philosophy 4 (1):1-16.

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Species Are Not Uniquely Real Biological Entities.Brent D. Mishler - 2010 - In Francisco José Ayala & Robert Arp (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Biology. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 110--122.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Linnaean Ranks: Vestiges of a Bygone Era.Marc Ereshefsky - 2002 - Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 2002 (3):S305-S315.
Names, Numbers and Indentations: A Guide to Post-Linnaean Taxonomy.M. Ereshefsky - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 32 (2):361-383.
Some Problems with the Linnaean Hierarchy.Marc Ereshefsky - 1994 - Philosophy of Science 61 (2):186-205.
The Evolution of the Linnaean Hierarchy.Marc Ereshefsky - 1997 - Biology and Philosophy 12 (4):493-519.
Names, Numbers and Indentations: A Guide to Post-Linnaean Taxonomy.Marc Ereshefsky - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 32 (2):361-383.
Categoricity and Ranks.Jürgen Saffe - 1984 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 49 (4):1379-1392.
Translation Studies in the History of Science: The Example of Vestiges.Nicolaas Rupke - 2000 - British Journal for the History of Science 33 (2):209-222.
Necessary Properties and Linnaean Essentialism.Berent Enç - 1975 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 5 (1):83 - 102.
Necessary Propertes and Linnaean Essentialism.Berent Enç - 1975 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 5 (1):83-102.
A Survey of Ranking Theory.Wolfgang Spohn - 2009 - In Franz Huber & Christoph Schmidt-Petri (eds.), Degrees of Belief. Springer.
Linnaeus: Progress and Prospects in Linnaean Research.Gunnar Broberg - 1982 - Journal of the History of Biology 15 (2):322-323.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-02-04

Total views
21 ( #512,080 of 2,445,517 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #232,435 of 2,445,517 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes