Analysis 64 (1):72-81 (2004)

Authors
Abstract
1. The Bundle Theory I shall discuss is a theory about the nature of substances or concrete particulars, like apples, chairs, atoms, stars and people. The point of the Bundle Theory is to avoid undesirable entities like substrata that allegedly constitute particulars. The version of the Bundle Theory I shall discuss takes particulars to be entirely constituted by the universals they instantiate.' Thus particulars are said to be just bundles of universals. Together with the claim that it is necessary that particulars have constituents, the fundamental claim of the Bundle Theory is: (BT) Necessarily, for every particular x and every entity y, y constitutes x if and only ify is a universal and x instantiates y. 2 The standard and supposedly devastating objection to the Bundle Theory is that it entails or is committed to a false version of the Principle of Identity of Indiscernibles (Armstrong 1978: 91, Loux 1998: 107), namely: (Pll) Necessarily, for all particulars x and y and every universal z, if z is instantiated by x if and only if z is instantiated byy, then x is numerically identical with y. The most famous counterexample to the Identity of Indiscernibles is that put forward by Max Black, consisting of a world where there are only two iron spheres two miles apart from each other, having the same diameter, temperature, colour, shape, size, etc (Black 1952: 156). Let us from now on think of the properties of the spheres in this world as universals. The possibility of this world, which I shall hereafter refer to as 'Black's world', makes (Pll) false.' And according to common philosophical opinion this means that the Bundle Theory is false..
Keywords Identity of Indiscernibles  Bundle Theory
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/analys/64.1.72
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

References found in this work BETA

A World of States of Affairs.D. M. Armstrong - 1996 - Cambridge University Press.
A World of States of Affairs.D. M. Armstrong - 1993 - Philosophical Perspectives 7:429-440.

View all 19 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Individuals: An Essay in Revisionary Metaphysics.Shamik Dasgupta - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 145 (1):35-67.
Bundle Theory with Kinds.Markku Keinänen & Tuomas E. Tahko - 2019 - Philosophical Quarterly 69 (277):838-857.
The Rise of Relationals.F. A. Muller - 2015 - Mind 124 (493):201-237.

View all 29 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

"Bare Particulars".Theodore Sider - 2006 - Philosophical Perspectives 20 (1):387–397.
A Modal Bundle Theory.Jiri Benovsky - 2006 - Metaphysica 7 (2).
Indiscernibility and Bundles in a Structure.Sun Demirli - 2010 - Philosophical Studies 151 (1):1-18.
Universals and Particulars: Readings in Ontology.Michael J. Loux (ed.) - 1970 - University of Notre Dame Press.
Particulars As Universals.Herbert Hochberg - 1995 - Journal of Philosophical Research 20:83-111.
The Brave New Bare Particularism.Richard Davis - 2004 - Modern Schoolman 81 (4):267-273.
Mental Particulars, Mental Events, and the Bundle Theory.Richard Aquila - 1979 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 9 (March):109-120.
Mereological Bundle Theory.L. A. Paul - forthcoming - In Hans Burkhardt, Johanna Seibt & Guido Imaguire (eds.), Handbook of Mereology. Philosophia Verlag.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
1,656 ( #1,691 of 2,348,202 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
97 ( #5,449 of 2,348,202 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes