Journal of Social Philosophy 27 (1):47-64 (1996)
Eating animals acts as mirror and representation of patriarchal values. Meat eating is the re-inscription of male power at every meal. The patriarchal gaze sees not the fragmented flesh of dead animals but appetizing food. If our appetites re-inscribe patriarchy, our actions regarding eating animals will either reify or challenge this received culture. If meat is a symbol of male dominance then the presence of meat proclaims the disempowering of women
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Vegetarian Meat: Could Technology Save Animals and Satisfy Meat Eaters?Patrick D. Hopkins & Austin Dacey - 2008 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 21 (6):579-596.
Home | Archives | Announcements | About the Journal | Submission Information | Contact Us.William Stephens - manuscript
Loose Women, Lecherous Men: A Feminist Philosophy of Sex.Linda Lemoncheck - 1998 - Philosophical Studies 89 (2-3):369-373.
Five Arguments for Vegetarianism.William O. Stephens - 1994 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 1 (4):25-39.
The Sexual Politics of Meat: A Feminist-Vegetarian Critical Theory.Deborah Slicer - 1992 - Environmental Ethics 14 (4):365-369.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads41 ( #126,427 of 2,170,276 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #60,867 of 2,170,276 )
How can I increase my downloads?