The Call of Being: On Pure Phenomenality and Radical Immanence

Labyrinth: An International Journal for Philosophy, Value Theory and Sociocultural Hermeneutics 21 (2):197-203 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

François Laruelle's system of non-standard philosophy and its univocal radical immanence is highly indebted to Henry's non-representationalism. Admittedly, in contrast to Laruelle's "heretical" Christology, Henry's theological-realist determination is astricted by the idealist paralogisms of a cogitativist Ego, which transpires most markedly in Henry's account of Faith-after all, Henry is a Jesuit phenomenologist following in the tradition of Jean-Luc Marion and Jean-Louis Chretien. Nonetheless, Henry's work on immanence, deanthropocentrized and universalized as generic, takes us much further than both Spinoza's speculative immanence, which is diluted by the necessitarian world of negative determination, and Deleuzian immanence, which is characterized by multiplicitous difference. In The Michel Henry Reader, editors Scott Davidson and Frédéric Seyler weave together a comprehensive anthology of essays that survey Henry's phenomenology of life, stitching together an oeuvre than spans Marxist political philosophy, phenomenology of language, subjectivity and aesthetics, and ethics qua religion. Rather than analyzing specific objects and phenomena, phenomenology is tasked with disclosing the structural manifestation and conditioned appearance of objects. Drawing primarily from Husserl and, consequently, Heidegger, Henry examines a kind of "pure phenomenology" that, contra intentionality and the inert world of visible objects, examines affectivity's "radical invisibility". Whereas Husserl and Heidegger's analyses emphasize the self-transcending nature of appearances, for Henry appearance is never independent or self-reliant but, instead, genitive and denotative.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Paradox and Limits of Michel Henry’s Concept of Transcendence.Jean-François Lavigne - 2009 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 17 (3):377 - 388.
Laruelle Qua Stiegler: On Non-Marxism and the Transindividual.Ekin Erkan - 2019 - Identities: Journal for Politics, Gender and Culture 16 (1-2).
Liu Zongzhou and Michel Henry on Absolute Subjectivity.Wing-Cheuk Chan - 2014 - Journal of Chinese Philosophy 41 (3-4):328-343.
Spinoza and the philosophy of immanence: Reflections on Yovel's the adventures of immanence.Henry E. Allison - 1992 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 35 (1):55 – 67.
On Laruelle and the Radical Dyad: Katerina Kolozova's Materialist Non-Humanism.Ekin Erkan - 2019 - Cultural Logic: A Journal of Marxist Theory and Practice 23:72-82.
Michel Henry, lecteur du "concept d'angoisse" de Kierkegaard.Nicole Hatem - 2001 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 191 (3):339-357.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-03-13

Downloads
218 (#58,342)

6 months
34 (#38,357)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references