Topoi 24 (2):229-242 (2005)
The aims of this paper are threefold: To show that game-playing (GP), the discipline of Artificial Intelligence (AI) concerned with the development of automated game players, has a strong epistemological relevance within both AI and the vast area of cognitive sciences. In this context games can be seen as a way of securely reducing (segmenting) real-world complexity, thus creating the laboratory environment necessary for testing the diverse types and facets of intelligence produced by computer models. This paper aims to promote the belief that games represent an excellent tool for the project of computational psychology (CP). To underline how, despite this, GP has mainly adopted an engineering-inspired methodology and in doing so has distorted the framework of cognitive functionalism. Many successes (i.e. chess, checkers) have been achieved refusing human-like reasoning. The AI has appeared to work well despite ignoring an intrinsic motivation, that of creating an explanatory link between machines and mind. To assert that substantial improvements in GP may be obtained in the future only by renewed interest in human-inspired models of reasoning and in other cognitive studies. In fact, if we increase the complexity of games (from NP-Completeness to AI-Completeness) in order to reproduce real-life problems, computer science techniques enter an impasse. Many of AI’s recent GP experiences can be shown to validate this. The lack of consistent philosophical foundations for cognitive AI and the minimal philosophical commitment of AI investigation are two of the major reasons that play an important role in explaining why CP has been overlooked.
|Keywords||Artificial Intelligence Cheating Game Play Psychology Reason Science|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Citations of this work BETA
The Paper World of Bernard Suits.Allan Bäck - 2008 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 35 (2):156-174.
Similar books and articles
Smoke Without Fire: What Do Virtual Experiments in Cognitive Science Really Tell Us?Mr Peter R. Krebs - unknown
Games as Formal Tools Versus Games as Explanations in Logic and Science.Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen - 2003 - Foundations of Science 8 (4):317-364.
Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence: A Critique of the Mechanistic Theory of Mind.Rajakishore Nath - 2009 - Universal Publishers.
Vigotsky and Artificial Intelligence: What Could Cognitive Psychology Possibly Be About?Rom Harre - 1990 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 15 (1):389-399.
Artificial Intelligence In Psychology: Interdisciplinary Essays.Margaret A. Boden - 1989 - Cambridge: MIT Press.
Philosophical Perspectives in Artificial Intelligence.Martin Ringle (ed.) - 1979 - Humanities Press.
Artificial Intelligence and Human Reason: A Teleological Critique.Joseph F. Rychlak - 1991 - Columbia University Press.
Historical Dictionary of Quotations in Cognitive Science: A Treasury of Quotations in Psychology, Philosophy, and Artificial Intelligence.Morton Wagman (ed.) - 2000 - Greenwood Press.
Artificial Intelligence, Psychology, and the Philosophy of Discovery.Paul Thagard - 1982 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:166 - 175.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads86 ( #59,760 of 2,158,929 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #353,777 of 2,158,929 )
How can I increase my downloads?