Artificial intelligence & games: Should computational psychology be revalued?

Topoi 24 (2):229-242 (2005)
Abstract
The aims of this paper are threefold: To show that game-playing (GP), the discipline of Artificial Intelligence (AI) concerned with the development of automated game players, has a strong epistemological relevance within both AI and the vast area of cognitive sciences. In this context games can be seen as a way of securely reducing (segmenting) real-world complexity, thus creating the laboratory environment necessary for testing the diverse types and facets of intelligence produced by computer models. This paper aims to promote the belief that games represent an excellent tool for the project of computational psychology (CP). To underline how, despite this, GP has mainly adopted an engineering-inspired methodology and in doing so has distorted the framework of cognitive functionalism. Many successes (i.e. chess, checkers) have been achieved refusing human-like reasoning. The AI has appeared to work well despite ignoring an intrinsic motivation, that of creating an explanatory link between machines and mind. To assert that substantial improvements in GP may be obtained in the future only by renewed interest in human-inspired models of reasoning and in other cognitive studies. In fact, if we increase the complexity of games (from NP-Completeness to AI-Completeness) in order to reproduce real-life problems, computer science techniques enter an impasse. Many of AI’s recent GP experiences can be shown to validate this. The lack of consistent philosophical foundations for cognitive AI and the minimal philosophical commitment of AI investigation are two of the major reasons that play an important role in explaining why CP has been overlooked.
Keywords Artificial Intelligence  Cheating  Game  Play  Psychology  Reason  Science
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11245-005-5090-0
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 33,625
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Vison.David Marr - 1982 - W. H. Freeman.

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Paper World of Bernard Suits.Allan Bäck - 2008 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 35 (2):156-174.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
92 ( #66,220 of 2,259,937 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #220,066 of 2,259,937 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature