Metaphilosophy 34 (5):553-562 (2003)
An exposition and discussion of Chisholm's “epistemic principles.” These are compared with relevant views of Wilfrid Sellars and Richard Foley. A further comparison, with the approach favored by Descartes, is argued to throw light on the status of such principles.
|Keywords||epistemic principles epistemic justification knowledge belief truth|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Givenness and Explanatory Coherence.Wilfrid S. Sellars - 1973 - Journal of Philosophy 70 (October):612-624.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Epistemic Closure Principles.Steven D. Hales - 1995 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 33 (2):185-202.
Analysis and Metaphysics: Essays in Honor of R. M. Chisholm.Roderick M. Chisholm & Keith Lehrer (eds.) - 1975 - D. Reidel Pub. Co..
Criticism and Revision of Chisholm's Epistemic Principle for Perception.Richard J. Hall - 1978 - Philosophia 7 (July):477-488.
Provability in Principle and Controversial Constructivistic Principles.Leon Horsten - 1997 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 26 (6):635-660.
A Note on Some Epistemic Principles of Chisholm and Martin.R. C. Sleigh Jr - 1964 - Journal of Philosophy 61 (7):216-218.
Chisholm's Epistemic Principles and Our Knowledge About Particular Things in the External World.Richard J. Hall - 1976 - Philosophical Studies 30 (1):29 - 37.
Symposia Papers: The Status of Epistemic Principles.Roderick M. Chisholm - 1990 - Noûs 24 (2):209-215.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads41 ( #127,806 of 2,177,827 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #166,559 of 2,177,827 )
How can I increase my downloads?