Metaphilosophy 34 (5):553-562 (2003)

Authors
Ernest Sosa
Rutgers University - New Brunswick
Abstract
An exposition and discussion of Chisholm's “epistemic principles.” These are compared with relevant views of Wilfrid Sellars and Richard Foley. A further comparison, with the approach favored by Descartes, is argued to throw light on the status of such principles.
Keywords epistemic principles  epistemic justification  knowledge  belief  truth
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9973.2003.00293.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,486
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Theory of Knowledge.Roderick M. Chisholm - 1966 - Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice-Hall.
The Philosophical Writings of Descartes.Rene Descartes - 1984 - Cambridge University Press.
Givenness and Explanatory Coherence.Wilfrid Sellars - 1973 - Journal of Philosophy 70 (October):612-624.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-08-10

Total views
53 ( #191,309 of 2,421,440 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #249,228 of 2,421,440 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes