Levels of organization: a deflationary account

Biology and Philosophy 30 (1):39-58 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The idea of levels of organization plays a central role in the philosophy of the life sciences. In this article, I first examine the explanatory goals that have motivated accounts of levels of organization. I then show that the most state-of-the-art and scientifically plausible account of levels of organization, the account of levels of mechanism proposed by Bechtel and Craver, is fundamentally problematic. Finally, I argue that the explanatory goals can be reached by adopting a deflationary approach, where levels of organization give way to more well-defined and fundamental notions, such as scale and composition.

Similar books and articles

The Relationship Between Psychological Capacities and Neurobiological Activities.Gregory Johnson - 2012 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 2 (3):453-480.
The Limitations of Hierarchical Organization.Angela Potochnik & Brian McGill - 2012 - Philosophy of Science 79 (1):120-140.
Levels of Reality and Levels of Representation.Claudio Gnoli & Roberto Poli - 2004 - Knowledge Organization 31 (3):151-160.
Toward a Neurology of Grammar.T. Givon - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):154-155.
Multiscale Integration in Scale Relativity Theory.Laurent Nottale - 2011 - Foundations of Science 16 (4):307-309.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-08-02

Downloads
710 (#11,822)

6 months
56 (#17,448)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Markus Eronen
University of Groningen

Citations of this work

Making Sense of Interlevel Causation in Mechanisms From a Metaphysical Perspective.Beate Krickel - 2017 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 48 (3):453-468.
Time Scales and Levels of Organization.James DiFrisco - 2017 - Erkenntnis 82 (4):795-818.

View all 26 citations / Add more citations