Peer reviewers can meet journals’ criteria for authorship

British Medical Journal 346:f166 (2013)

Authors
David M. Shaw
University of Basel
Abstract
This article argues that some reviewers contribute more to research than many authors, and suggests that reviewers meet the ICMJE criteria for authorship in many cases.
Keywords Authorship  Ethics
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,247
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Criteria for Authorship in Bioethics.David B. Resnik & Zubin Master - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (10):17 - 21.
Guest Authors in An Iranian Journal.Mahsa Ghajarzadeh - 2012 - Developing World Bioethics 12 (3):15-19.
Ethics of Field Research: Do Journals Set the Standard?Helene Marsh & Carole M. Eros - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (3):375-382.
Responsible Authorship and Peer Review.James R. Wilson - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (2):155-174.
Proliferation of Authors on Research Reports in Medicine.Joost P. H. Drenth - 1996 - Science and Engineering Ethics 2 (4):469-480.
Policies and Perspectives on Authorship.Mary Rose & Karla Fischer - 1995 - Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (4):361-370.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-01-03

Total views
0

Recent downloads (6 months)
0

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes