Synthese 185 (1):53-72 (2012)
The purpose of this paper is to offer a critical approach to the theory of autopoiesis in order to see how it challenges mainstream Darwinism. In the first part of the paper, I characterize Darwinism from the concepts of natural selection, heredity, reproduction, and evolution. This characterization is absolutely schematic, and I hope not controversial at all, since my aim is to provide a general background for the discussion of the rest of the paper. The second part presents the main tenets of the theory of autopoiesis, also paying special attention to the concepts of natural selection, heredity, reproduction, and evolution. The third and final part considers some criticisms that have been directed against the theory and suggests some new ones. As I said, my intention is to offer a critical approach, so that I pretend to assess neither autopoiesis nor Darwinism. The assessment, it seems to me, would be a matter of scientific debate—not properly of philosophy. Therefore, given that my approach attempts to be a conceptual clarification, my contribution to the contemporary debate about Darwinism is twofold. On the one hand, I show that conceptually autopoiesis constitutes an important challenge to Darwinism, but on the other, I also show that some fundamental aspects of the theory appear to be both epistemologically and empirically problematic, which perhaps helps to understand why autopoiesis is not widely accepted in mainstream Darwinism.
|Keywords||Autopoiesis Darwinism Evolution Reproduction Natural selection Natural drift Fitness|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Autopoiesis and Cognition the Realization of the Living.H. R. MATURANA - 1980 - D. Reidel Publishing Company.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Autopoiesis and Lifelines: The Importance of Origins.Evan Thompson & Francisco J. Varela - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):909-910.
The Explanatory Logic and Ontological Commitments of Generalized Darwinism.J. W. Stoelhorst - 2008 - Journal of Economic Methodology 15 (4):343-363.
Bricks Without Straw: Darwinism in the Social Sciences.Peter T. Saunders - 2003 - Theoria 18 (3):259-272.
Taking Biology Seriously : Neo-Darwinism and its Many Challenges.Davide Vecchi - 2012 - In Martin H. Brinkworth & Friedel Weinert (eds.), Evolution 2.0: Implications of Darwinism in Philosophy and the Social and Natural Sciences. Springer.
Autopoiesis, Adaptivity, Teleology, Agency.Ezequiel A. Di Paolo - 2005 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 4 (4):429-452.
Evolution, Society, and Ethics: Social Darwinism Versus Evolutionary Ethics.Christine Clavien - forthcoming - In Thomas Heams (ed.), Handbook of Evolutionary Biology (provis. Title). Springer.
Life and Mind: From Autopoiesis to Neurophenomenology. A Tribute to Francisco Varela.Evan Thompson - 2004 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 3 (4):381-398.
The Evolution of Darwinism: Selection, Adaptation, and Progress in Evolutionary Biology.Timothy Shanahan - 2004 - Cambridge University Press.
Rachels on Darwinism and Theism.John Lemos - 2003 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 77 (3):399-415.
What Does Fodor's “Anti-Darwinism” Mean to Natural Theology?Yingjin Xu - 2011 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 6 (3):465-479.
Added to index2012-02-01
Total downloads42 ( #120,104 of 2,152,003 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #162,637 of 2,152,003 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.