Some remarks in reply to professor Hartshorne


Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2307/2104649
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 47,350
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Process as Inclusive Category: A Reply.Charles Hartshorne - 1955 - Journal of Philosophy 52 (4):94-102.
Professor Hartshorne's Syllogism: Rejoinder.Charles Hartshorne - 1945 - Philosophical Review 54 (5):506-508.
Remarks on Professor Cunningham's "Reply".James F. Anderson - 1949 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 10 (2):262.
Professor Hartshorne's Syllogism: Criticism.William Elton - 1945 - Philosophical Review 54 (5):506.
Reply to Professor Brender and Professor Byrne.Phillip Cole - 2002 - Social Philosophy Today 18:197-206.
A Reply to Professor Wheatley.Henry S. Leonard - 1961 - Philosophy of Science 28 (1):55-64.
Ontological Primacy: A Reply to Buchler.Charles Hartshorne - 1970 - Journal of Philosophy 67 (23):979-986.
Whitehead on Process: A Reply to Professor Eslick.Charles Hartshorne - 1958 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 18 (4):514-520.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
27 ( #349,892 of 2,291,120 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #829,891 of 2,291,120 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature