Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 42 (1):40-49 (2011)
In this paper I propose a new interpretation of the British evolutionary synthesis. The synthetic work of J. B. S. Haldane, R. A. Fisher and J. S. Huxley was characterized by both an integration of Mendelism and Darwinism and the unification of different biological subdisciplines within a coherent framework. But it must also be seen as a bold and synthetic Darwinian program in which the biosciences served as a utopian blueprint for the progress of civilization. Describing the futuristic visions of these three scientists in their synthetic heydays, I show that, despite a number of important divergences, their biopolitical ideals could be biased toward a controlled and regimented utopian society. Their common ideals entailed a social order where liberal and democratic principles were partially or totally suspended in favor of bioscientific control and planning for the future. Finally, I will argue that the original redefinition of Darwinism that modern synthesizers proposed is a significant historical example of how Darwinism has been used and adapted in different contexts. The lesson I draw from this account is a venerable one: that, whenever we wish to define Darwinism, we need to recognize not only its scientific content and achievements but expose the other traditions and ideologies it may have supported
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Fisher's Fundamental Theorem of Natural Selection—a Philosophical Analysis.Samir Okasha - 2008 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59 (3):319-351.
Last Judgment: The Visionary Biology of J. B. S. Haldane. [REVIEW]Mark B. Adams - 2000 - Journal of the History of Biology 33 (3):457 - 491.
R. A. Fisher: A Faith Fit for Eugenics.James Moore - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 38 (1):110-135.
Eugenics: Can It Solve the Problem of Decay of Civilizations?R. A. Fisher - 1926 - The Eugenics Review 18 (2):128.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Evolutionary Synthesis: A Search for the Strategy.Juha Tuomi - 1992 - Philosophy of Science 59 (3):429-438.
Do We Need an Extended Evolutionary Synthesis?Massimo Pigliucci - 2007 - Evolution 61 (12):2743-2749.
An Extended Synthesis for Evolutionary Biology.Massimo Pigliucci - 2009 - Annals of the New York Academy of Science 1168:218-228.
Generative Entrenchment and an Evolutionary Developmental Biology for Culture.William C. Wimsatt - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (4):364-366.
Evolutionary Theory in the 1920s: The Nature of the “Synthesis”.Sahotra Sarkar - 2004 - Philosophy of Science 71 (5):1215-1226.
Political Arguments Against Utopianism.Roger Paden - 1999 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 6 (1):7-17.
Foreword to Julian Huxley's "Evolution: The Modern Synthesis".Massimo Pigliucci & Gerd Müller - 2010 - In Massimo Pigliucci & Gerd Müller (eds.), Evolution: The Modern Synthesis The Definitive Edition Edition. MIT Press. pp. 1-8.
Evolutionary Theory in the 1920s: The Nature of the "Synthesis".Sahotra Sarkar - 2004 - Philosophy of Science 71 (5):1215-1226.
A Particular Synthesis: Aleksandr Promptov and Speciation in Birds. [REVIEW]Nikolai Krementsov - 2007 - Journal of the History of Biology 40 (4):637 - 682.
Woodger, Positivism, and the Evolutionary Synthesis.Joe Cain - 2000 - Biology and Philosophy 15 (4):535-551.
His Own Synthesis: Corn, Edgar Anderson, and Evolutionary Theory in the 1940s. [REVIEW]Kim Kleinman - 1999 - Journal of the History of Biology 32 (2):293 - 320.
Added to index2012-03-03
Total downloads21 ( #232,644 of 2,154,061 )
Recent downloads (6 months)9 ( #76,939 of 2,154,061 )
How can I increase my downloads?