Utopianism in the British evolutionary synthesis

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 42 (1):40-49 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper I propose a new interpretation of the British evolutionary synthesis. The synthetic work of J. B. S. Haldane, R. A. Fisher and J. S. Huxley was characterized by both an integration of Mendelism and Darwinism and the unification of different biological subdisciplines within a coherent framework. But it must also be seen as a bold and synthetic Darwinian program in which the biosciences served as a utopian blueprint for the progress of civilization. Describing the futuristic visions of these three scientists in their synthetic heydays, I show that, despite a number of important divergences, their biopolitical ideals could be biased toward a controlled and regimented utopian society. Their common ideals entailed a social order where liberal and democratic principles were partially or totally suspended in favor of bioscientific control and planning for the future. Finally, I will argue that the original redefinition of Darwinism that modern synthesizers proposed is a significant historical example of how Darwinism has been used and adapted in different contexts. The lesson I draw from this account is a venerable one: that, whenever we wish to define Darwinism, we need to recognize not only its scientific content and achievements but expose the other traditions and ideologies it may have supported

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,047

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What was really synthesized during the evolutionary synthesis? A historiographic proposal.Richard G. Delisle - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 42 (1):50-59.
Defining Darwinism.David L. Hull - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 42 (1):2-4.
Should we ask for more than consistency of Darwinism with Mendelism?Alan Grafen - 2019 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 78:101224.
Darwinism without populations: a more inclusive understanding of the “Survival of the Fittest”.Frédéric Bouchard - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 42 (1):106-114.
The uncertain foundation of neo-Darwinism: metaphysical and epistemological pluralism in the evolutionary synthesis.Richard G. Delisle - 2009 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 40 (2):119-132.
Conflicts in human progress: sexual selection and the Fisherian ‘runaway’.Mary M. Hartley - 1994 - British Journal for the History of Science 27 (2):177-196.
The Creativity of Natural Selection? Part II: The Synthesis and Since.John Beatty - 2019 - Journal of the History of Biology 52 (4):705-731.
Social Darwinism: from reality to myth and from myth to reality.Daniel Becquemont - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 42 (1):12-19.
Paleontology at the “high table”? Popularization and disciplinary status in recent paleontology.David Sepkoski - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 45 (1):133-138.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-03-03

Downloads
54 (#394,030)

6 months
8 (#546,836)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

From human science to biology.Maurizio Esposito - 2016 - History of the Human Sciences 29 (3):44-62.
Evidence? What Evidence?Steve Fuller - 2011 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 41 (4):567-573.
“Genetic Load”: How the Architects of the Modern Synthesis Became Trapped in a Scientific Ideology.Alexandra Soulier - 2018 - Transversal: International Journal for the Historiography of Science 4:118.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Fisher’s Fundamental Theorem of Natural Selection--A Philosophical Analysis.Samir Okasha - 2008 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59 (3):319-351.
R. A. Fisher: a faith fit for eugenics.James Moore - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 38 (1):110-135.
Julian Huxley and biological progress.Robert M. Gascoigne - 1991 - Journal of the History of Biology 24 (3):433-455.

View all 12 references / Add more references