Democratic Authority: A Philosophical Framework
Princeton University Press (2008)
Abstract
Democracy is not naturally plausible. Why turn such important matters over to masses of people who have no expertise? Many theories of democracy answer by appealing to the intrinsic value of democratic procedure, leaving aside whether it makes good decisions. In Democratic Authority, David Estlund offers a groundbreaking alternative based on the idea that democratic authority and legitimacy must depend partly on democracy's tendency to make good decisions.Just as with verdicts in jury trials, Estlund argues, the authority and legitimacy of a political decision does not depend on the particular decision being good or correct. But the "epistemic value" of the procedure--the degree to which it can generally be accepted as tending toward a good decision--is nevertheless crucial. Yet if good decisions were all that mattered, one might wonder why those who know best shouldn't simply rule.Estlund's theory--which he calls "epistemic proceduralism"--avoids epistocracy, or the rule of those who know. He argues that while some few people probably do know best, this can be used in political justification only if their expertise is acceptable from all reasonable points of view. If we seek the best epistemic arrangement in this respect, it will be recognizably democratic--with laws and policies actually authorized by the people subject to themAuthor's Profile
Reprint years
2009
ISBN(s)
9780691143248 0691143242 0691124175
My notes
Similar books and articles
Problems in the Theory of Democratic Authority.Christopher S. King - 2012 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (4):431 - 448.
Reasonable Acceptability and Democratic Legitimacy: Estlund's Qualified Acceptability Requirement On Seeking the Truth (Whatever That Is) through Democracy: Estlund's Case for the Qualified Epistemic Claim Estlund's Promising Account of Democratic Authority Consent and Its Cousins Reply.David Estlund - 2011 - Ethics 121 (2):354-389.
An epistemic defense of democracy: David Estlund's democratic authority.Elizabeth Anderson - 2008 - Episteme 5 (1):pp. 129-139.
Thinking about the nature and role of authority in democratic education with Rousseau's Emile.Olivier Michaud - 2012 - Educational Theory 62 (3):287-304.
The Constitution of Equality: Democratic Authority and its Limits.Thomas Christiano - 2010 - Oxford University Press.
Which countries count? Lawrence V. texas and the selection of foreign persuasive authority.Rex D. Glensy - manuscript
Estlund’s Promising Account of Democratic Authority.Henry S. Richardson - 2011 - Ethics 121 (2):301-334.
Debate: Estlund on democratic authority.Thomas Christiano - 2009 - Journal of Political Philosophy 17 (2):228-240.
Review of Thomas Christiano, The Constitution of Equality: Democratic Authority and its Limits. [REVIEW]David Lefkowitz - 2009 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2009 (5).
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-03-09
Downloads
162 (#79,361)
6 months
18 (#59,436)
2014-03-09
Downloads
162 (#79,361)
6 months
18 (#59,436)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Ideal vs. Non‐ideal Theory: A Conceptual Map.Laura Valentini - 2012 - Philosophy Compass 7 (9):654-664.
Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory.Dan Sperber - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (2):57.
The Threat of Algocracy: Reality, Resistance and Accommodation.John Danaher - 2016 - Philosophy and Technology 29 (3):245-268.
Understanding Political Feasibility.Holly Lawford-Smith - 2013 - Journal of Political Philosophy 21 (3):243-259.