Theory and Decision 49 (1):79-96 (2000)
It is always possible to construct a real function f, given random quantities X and Y with continuous distribution functions F and G, respectively, in such a way that f(X) and f(Y), also random quantities, have both the same distribution function, say H. This result of De Finetti introduces an alternative way to somehow describe the `opinion' of a group of experts about a continuous random quantity by the construction of Fields of coincidence of opinions (FCO). A Field of coincidence of opinions is a finite union of intervals where the opinions of the experts coincide with respect to that quantity of interest. We speculate on (dis)advantages of Fields of Opinion compared to usual `probability' measures of a group and on their relation with a continuous version of the well-known Allais' paradox
|Keywords||Field of coincidence of opinions Allais' paradox|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
When Coherent Preferences May Not Preserve Indifference Between Equivalent Random Variables: A Price for Unbounded Utilities.Teddy Seidenfeld, Mark Schervish & Joseph Kadane - unknown
Group Level Interpretations of Probability: New Directions.Darrell P. Rowbottom - 2013 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 94 (2):188-203.
Do Computer Simulations Support the Argument From Disagreement?Aron Vallinder & Erik J. Olsson - 2013 - Synthese 190 (8):1437-1454.
Which Opinion Should a Clinical Ethicist Give: Personal Viewpoint or Professional Consensus?Walter Edinger - 1992 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 13 (1).
Realistic Opinion Aggregation: Lehrer-Wagner with a Finite Set of Opinion Values. [REVIEW]R. Bradley & Wagner - 2012 - Episteme 9 (2):91-99.
The Epistemology and Ethics of Consensus: Uses and Misuses of 'Ethical' Expertise.Rosemarie Tong - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (4):409-426.
Adding One Random Real.Tomek Bartoszyński, Andrzej Rosłanowski & Saharon Shelah - 1996 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 61 (1):80-90.
Aristotelianism in the Philosophy of Mathematics.James Franklin - 2011 - Studia Neoaristotelica 8 (1):3-15.
Suárez on Continuous Quantity.Jorge Secada - 2012 - In Benjamin Hill & Henrik Lagerlund (eds.), The Philosophy of Francisco Suárez. Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York.
On the Nature of Continuous Physical Quantities in Classical and Quantum Mechanics.Hans Halvorson - 2001 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 30 (1):27-50.
A Computer Simulation of the Argument From Disagreement.Johan E. Gustafsson & Martin Peterson - 2012 - Synthese 184 (3):387–405.
Added to index2010-09-02
Total downloads27 ( #184,858 of 2,151,957 )
Recent downloads (6 months)12 ( #44,813 of 2,151,957 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.