Reply to Wiens

European Journal of Political Theory 15 (3):353-362 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In Human Nature and the Limits of Political Philosophy, I argued that justice might require things of people that they cannot bring themselves to do. A central step was to argue that this does not entail an inability to ‘do’ the putatively required thing. David Wiens challenges that argument of mine, and this piece is my reply.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 77,894

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Motivational Limitations on the Demands of Justice.David Wiens - 2016 - European Journal of Political Theory 15 (3):333-352.
In Defence of Anthropomorphic Theism.Peter Forrest - 2011 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 3 (1):105 - 122.
A Reply to Arnold's Reply.David Schweickart - 1987 - Economics and Philosophy 3 (2):331.
Business Ethics 101. Wiens droom?Mark Theunissen - 2012 - Wijsgerig Perspectief 52 (1).
Graded transmission, mechanistic multiplicity, and modeling.Theodore J. Wiens - 1980 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (4):563-564.
How (not) to attack the luck argument.E. J. Coffman - 2010 - Philosophical Explorations 13 (2):157-166.
Evil and the Proper Basicality of Belief in God.Paul Draper - 1991 - Faith and Philosophy 8 (2):135-147.
A logic of message and reply.David Harrah - 1985 - Synthese 63 (3):275 - 294.
Reply to Van Inwagen.Richard Foley - 1980 - Analysis 40 (March):101-103.
A logic of message and reply.David Harrah - 1984 - Synthese 58 (2):275 - 294.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-09-01

Downloads
38 (#314,257)

6 months
2 (#325,240)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Estlund
Brown University

References found in this work

Human Nature and the Limits (If Any) of Political Philosophy.David Estlund - 2011 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 39 (3):207-237.
'Ought' and Ability.P. A. Graham & Peter Graham - 2011 - Philosophical Review 120 (3):337-382.
'Ought' and 'can'.Michael Stocker - 1971 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 49 (3):303 – 316.

Add more references