- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
What’s So Rickety?: Richardson’s Non-Epistemic Democracy
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (1):204-210 (2005)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
ISBN(s)
0031-8205
My notes
Similar books and articles
What’s So Rickety?: Richardson’s Non-Epistemic Democracy.David Estlund - 2005 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (1):204-204.
An epistemic defense of democracy: David Estlund's democratic authority.Elizabeth Anderson - 2008 - Episteme 5 (1):pp. 129-139.
The Epistemic Circumstances of Democracy.Fabienne Peter - 2016 - In Miranda Fricker Michael Brady (ed.), The Epistemic Life of Groups. pp. 133 - 149.
Justifying deliberative democracy: Are two heads always wiser than one|[quest]|.Zsuzsanna Chappell - 2011 - Contemporary Political Theory 10 (1):78.
Democracy and epistemology: a reply to Talisse.Annabelle Lever - 2015 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 18 (1):74-81.
Democratic Authority: A Philosophical Framework.David M. Estlund - 2008 - Princeton University Press.
Democratic legitimacy and proceduralist social epistemology.Fabienne Peter - 2007 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 6 (3):329-353.
Should We Be Utopophobes About Democracy in Particular?Patrick Tomlin - 2012 - Political Studies Review 10 (1):36-47.
Democracy and ignorance: Reply to Friedman.Robert B. Talisse - 2006 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 18 (4):453-466.
Epistemic theories of democracy, constitutionalism and the procedural legitimacy of fundamental rights.Yann Allard-Tremblay - 2012 - Dissertation, University of St Andrews
Reasonable Acceptability and Democratic Legitimacy: Estlund's Qualified Acceptability Requirement On Seeking the Truth (Whatever That Is) through Democracy: Estlund's Case for the Qualified Epistemic Claim Estlund's Promising Account of Democratic Authority Consent and Its Cousins Reply.David Estlund - 2011 - Ethics 121 (2):354-389.
Why Democracy Cannot Be Grounded in Epistemic Principles.Eva Erman & Niklas Möller - 2016 - Social Theory and Practice 42 (3):449-473.
Introduction: Epistemic Approaches to Democracy.David Estlund - 2008 - Episteme: A Journal of Social Epistemology 5 (1):1-4.
Epistemic Elitism, Paternalism, and Confucian Democracy.Shaun O’Dwyer - 2015 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 14 (1):33-54.
Analytics
Added to PP
2017-02-16
Downloads
12 (#812,610)
6 months
5 (#166,652)
2017-02-16
Downloads
12 (#812,610)
6 months
5 (#166,652)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-5ffd8f9497-mnh4c N