Disfluency attenuates the reception of pseudoprofound and postmodernist bullshit

Thinking and Reasoning 1 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Four studies explore the role of perceptual fluency in attenuating bullshit receptivity, or the tendency for individuals to rate otherwise meaningless statements as “profound”. Across four studies, we presented participants with a sample of pseudoprofound bullshit statements in either a fluent or disfluent font and found that overall, disfluency attenuated bullshit receptivity while also finding little evidence that this effect was moderated by cognitive thinking style. In all studies, we measured participants’ cognitive reflection, need for cognition, faith in intuition, and superstitious beliefs. Superstition strongly predicted bullshit receptivity regardless of fluency. Inconclusive results were found for the remaining scales. Potential links for the role of perceptual disfluency in promoting analytic thinking are discussed.

Similar books and articles

Rethinking Bullshit Receptivity.Jonathan Wilson - 2023 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology.
Different Kinds and Aspects of Bullshit.Hans Maes & Katrien8 Schaubroeck - 2006 - In Hardcastle Reisch (ed.), Bullshit and Philosophy. Chicago: Open Court.
Our vision and our mission: Bullshit, assertion and belief.Ben Kotzee - 2007 - South African Journal of Philosophy 26 (2):163-175.
Raising the tone: Definition, bullshit, and the definition of bullshit.Andrew Aberdein - 2006 - In G. Reisch & G. Hardcastle (eds.), Bullshit and Philosophy. Open Court. pp. 151-169.
Argumentative Bullshit.José Ángel Gascón - 2021 - Informal Logic 43 (1):289-308.
Bullshit, Truth, and Reason.Eldar Sarajlic - 2019 - Philosophia 47 (3):865-879.
Kitsch and Bullshit.Thorsten Botz-Bornstein - 2015 - Philosophy and Literature 39 (2):305-321.
Bullshit Questions.Dennis Whitcomb - forthcoming - Analysis.
Kitsch and the Social Pretense Theory of Bullshit Art.Lucas Scripter - 2021 - Polish Journal of Aesthetics 4 (63):47-67.
On Bullshit.Harry G. Frankfurt - 1986 - Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
The Wrong of Bullshit.Thorian R. Harris - forthcoming - Social Epistemology.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-11-22

Downloads
332 (#63,361)

6 months
194 (#15,228)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Nicolas Porot
Mohammed VI Polytechnic University
Eric Mandelbaum
CUNY Graduate Center

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition Advancing the Debate.Jonathan Evans & Keith E. Stanovich - 2013 - Perspectives on Psychological Science 8 (3):223-241.
On Bullshit.Harry G. Frankfurt - 1986 - Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Thinking is Believing.Eric Mandelbaum - 2014 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 57 (1):55-96.

View all 19 references / Add more references