Bayesian argumentation and the value of logical validity

Psychological Review 125 (5):806-821 (2018)
Authors
Abstract
According to the Bayesian paradigm in the psychology of reasoning, the norms by which everyday human cognition is best evaluated are probabilistic rather than logical in character. Recently, the Bayesian paradigm has been applied to the domain of argumentation, where the fundamental norms are traditionally assumed to be logical. Here, we present a major generalisation of extant Bayesian approaches to argumentation that utilizes a new class of Bayesian learning methods that are better suited to modelling dynamic and conditional inferences than standard Bayesian conditionalization, is able to characterise the special value of logically valid argument schemes in uncertain reasoning contexts, greatly extends the range of inferences and argumentative phenomena that can be adequately described in a Bayesian framework, and undermines some influential theoretical motivations for dual function models of human cognition. We conclude that the probabilistic norms given by the Bayesian approach to rationality are not necessarily at odds with the norms given by classical logic. Rather, the Bayesian theory of argumentation can be seen as justifying and enriching the argumentative norms of classical logic.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1037/rev0000114
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 37,134
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Combining Argumentation and Bayesian Nets for Breast Cancer Prognosis.Matt Williams & Jon Williamson - 2006 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 15 (1-2):155-178.
Argument Diagram Extraction From Evidential Bayesian Networks.Jeroen Keppens - 2012 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 20 (2):109-143.
Bayesian Informal Logic and Fallacy.Kevin Korb - 2004 - Informal Logic 24 (1):41-70.
How to Use Probabilities in Reasoning.John L. Pollock - 1991 - Philosophical Studies 64 (1):65 - 85.
Discussion. On Chihara's 'the Howson-Urbach Proofs of Bayesian Principles'.C. Howson - 1997 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (1):83-90.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-03-25

Total downloads
15 ( #408,701 of 2,308,426 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #447,060 of 2,308,426 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature