Authors
Robert Mark Simpson
University College London
Nicholas Evans
Australian National University
Michael Selgelid
Monash University
Abstract
In debates over the regulation of communication related to dual-use research, the risks that such communication creates must be weighed against against the value of scientific autonomy. The censorship of such communication seems justifiable in certain cases, given the potentially catastrophic applications of some dual-use research. This conclusion however, gives rise to another kind of danger: that regulators will use overly simplistic cost-benefit analysis to rationalize excessive regulation of scientific research. In response to this, we show how institutional design principles and normative frameworks from free speech theory can be used to help extend the argument for regulating dangerous dual-use research beyond overly simplistic cost-benefit reasoning, but without reverting to an implausibly absolutist view of scientific autonomy.
Keywords Research ethics  Free speech  Dual-use research  Risk
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/jmp/jhab041
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Anarchy, State, and Utopia.Robert Nozick - 1974 - New York: Basic Books.
Political Liberalism.J. Rawls - 1995 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 57 (3):596-598.
On Human Rights.James Griffin - 2008 - Oxford University Press.
A Theory of Freedom of Expression.Thomas Scanlon - 1972 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 (2):204-226.

View all 23 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Dual Use Research: Investigation Across Multiple Science Disciplines.Shannon Oltmann - 2015 - Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (2):327-341.
Dual-Use Decision Making: Relational and Positional Issues.Nicholas G. Evans - 2014 - Monash Bioethics Review 32 (3-4):268-283.
The Problems with Forbidding Science.Gary E. Marchant & Lynda L. Pope - 2009 - Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (3):375-394.
Data Sharing and Dual-Use Issues.Louise Bezuidenhout - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (1):83-92.
Agent-Based Models of Dual-Use Research Restrictions.Elliott Wagner & Jonathan Herington - 2021 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 72 (2):377-399.
The Dilemma of Dual Use Biological Research: Polish Perspective.Marek Czarkowski - 2010 - Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (1):99-110.
A Note on the Definition of “Dual Use”.John Forge - 2010 - Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (1):111-118.
The Social Risks of Science.Jonathan Herington & Scott Tanona - 2020 - Hastings Center Report 50 (6):27-38.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2022-02-14

Total views
83 ( #140,169 of 2,507,715 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
83 ( #9,307 of 2,507,715 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes