Speak No Evil: Scientists, Responsibility, and the Public Understanding of Science [Book Review]

NanoEthics 4 (3):215-220 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, I will discuss the responsibilities that scientists have for ensuring their work is interpreted correctly. I will argue that there are three good reasons for scientists to work to ensure the appropriate communication of their findings. First, I will argue that scientists have a general obligation to ensure scientific research is communicated properly based on the vulnerability of others to the misrepresentation of their work. Second, I will argue that scientists have a special obligation to do so because of the power we as a society invest in them as specialists and professionals. Finally, I will argue that scientists ought to ensure their work is interpreted correctly based on prudential, self-interested considerations. I will conclude by offering suggestions regarding policy considerations

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 79,794

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ethics and science: Educating the public.R. Brownhill & L. Merricks - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (1):43-57.
Science today: problem or crisis?Ralph Levinson & Jeff Thomas (eds.) - 1997 - New York: Routledge.
Why scientists should cooperate with journalists.Boyce Rensberger - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (4):549-552.
The social responsibilities of biological scientists.Stanley Joel Reiser & Ruth E. Bulger - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (2):137-143.
Hype and Public Trust in Science.Zubin Master & David B. Resnik - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (2):321-335.
Is Science Really a Young Man’s Game?K. Brad Wray - 2003 - Social Studies of Science 33 (1):137-49.
Scientific Research and the Public Trust.David B. Resnik - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (3):399-409.
The impact of conflict of interest on trust in science.Paul J. Friedman - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (3):413-420.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-11-18

Downloads
47 (#261,135)

6 months
1 (#479,917)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?