Who legitimately Speaks for religion in public bioethics?

In David E. Guinn, Handbook of bioethics and religion. New York: Oxford University Press (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This chapter discusses the various meanings of the two critical ideas in this book and compares them. These critical ideas are “religion” and “public bioethics”. The chapter focuses most of all not on the different religious roles, but on what we think “public bioethics” is or should be.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 106,010

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Handbook of bioethics and religion.David E. Guinn (ed.) - 2006 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Religion and Bioethics: Can We Talk? [REVIEW]William E. Stempsey - 2011 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8 (4):339-350.
Introduction.David E. Guinn - 2006 - In Handbook of bioethics and religion. New York: Oxford University Press.
A history of religion and bioethics.Albert R. Jonsen - 2006 - In David E. Guinn, Handbook of bioethics and religion. New York: Oxford University Press.
Religion and bioethics: toward an expanded understanding.Howard Brody & Arlene Macdonald - 2013 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 34 (2):133-145.
Theology's role in public bioethics.Lisa Sowle Cahill - 2006 - In David E. Guinn, Handbook of bioethics and religion. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bioethics, religion, and linguistic capital.Tod Chambers - 2006 - In David E. Guinn, Handbook of bioethics and religion. New York: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
34 (#741,007)

6 months
11 (#331,843)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John Evans
Chungbuk National University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references