Two Objections to Wide-Scoping

Grazer Philosophische Studien 83 (1):251-255 (2011)
Abstract
Wide-scopers argue that the detachment of intuitively false ‘ought’ claims from hypothetical imperatives is blocked because ‘ought’ takes wide, as opposed to narrow, scope. I present two arguments against this view. The first questions the premise that natural language conditionals are true just in case the antecedent is false. The second shows that intuitively false ‘ought’s can still be detached even WITH wide-scope readings. This weakens the motivation for wide-scoping.
Keywords hypothetical imperatives  problem of detachment  wide and narrow scope
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
The Normativity of Rationality.Benjamin Kiesewetter - 2017 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
In Defense of the Wide-Scope Instrumental Principle.Simon Rippon - 2011 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 5 (2):1-21.
Defending the Wide-Scope Approach to Instrumental Reason.Jonathan Way - 2010 - Philosophical Studies 147 (2):213 - 233.
The Symmetry of Rational Requirements.Jonathan Way - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 155 (2):227-239.
Wide or Narrow Scope?John Broome - 2007 - Mind 116 (462):359-370.
The Scope of Instrumental Reason.Mark Schroeder - 2004 - Philosophical Perspectives 18 (1):337–364.
Unifying the Requirements of Rationality.Andrew Reisner - 2009 - Philosophical Explorations 12 (3):243-260.
The Scope of Rational Requirements.John Brunero - 2010 - Philosophical Quarterly 60 (238):28-49.
State or Process Requirements?Niko Kolodny - 2007 - Mind 116 (462):371-385.
Hypothetical Imperatives: Scope and Jurisdiction.Mark Schroeder - forthcoming - In Robert Johnson & Mark Timmons (eds.), (unknown). Oxford University Press.
The Scope of Even and Quantifier Raising.Kimiko Nakanishi - 2012 - Natural Language Semantics 20 (2):115-136.
The Normativity of Rationality.Jonathan Way - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (12):1057-1068.
Added to PP index
2010-09-02

Total downloads
226 ( #17,278 of 2,192,158 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #42,377 of 2,192,158 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature