The rationality of science and the rationality of faith

Journal of Philosophy 98 (1):19-42 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Why is science so rare and faith so common in human history? Traditional cultures persist because it is subjectively rational for each maturing child to defer to the unanimous beliefs of his elders, regardless of any personal doubts. Science is possible only when individuals promote new theories (which will probably be proven false) and forgo the epistemic advantages of accepting established views (which are more likely to be true). Hence, progressive science must rely upon the epistemic altruism of experimental thinkers, while traditions of faith depend on the epistemic self-interest of their followers.

Similar books and articles

Consensus and Evolution in Science.Gonzalo Munevar - 1986 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:120 - 129.
Does rationality presuppose irrationality.Xavier Vanmechelen - 1998 - Philosophical Explorations 1 (2):126 – 139.
The Many Facets of the Theory of Rationality.Wolfgang Spohn - 2002 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 2 (3):249-264.


Added to PP

578 (#29,097)

6 months
243 (#9,077)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ted Everett
State University of New York at Geneseo

Citations of this work

Are disagreements honest.Tyler Cowen & Robin Hanson - forthcoming - Journal of Economic Methodology.
Observation and Induction.Theodore J. Everett - 2010 - Logos and Episteme 1 (2):303-324.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references