Zygon 51 (4):966-982 (2016)
AbstractThis article discusses “explaining away” arguments in the cognitive science of religion. I distinguish two rather different ways of explaining away religion, one where religion is shown to be incompatible with scientific findings and one where supernatural entities are rendered superfluous by scientific explanations. After discussing possible objections to both varieties, I argue that the latter way offers better prospects for successfully explaining away religion but that some caveats must be made. In a second step, I spell out how CSR can be used to spell out an argument of the second kind. One argument renders religion superfluous by claiming that it results from a cognitive bias and one does the same by claiming religion was a useful evolutionary adaptation. I discuss some strengths and weaknesses of both arguments.
Similar books and articles
Explaining God Away?Kelly James Clark - 2010 - In Science and Religion in Dialogue. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 514--526.
Evolutionary Accounts of Religion: Explaining or Explaining Away.Michael J. Murray - 2010 - In Science and Religion in Dialogue. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 472--478.
The Cognitive Science of Religion/Atheism and its Impact on Plantinga's Reformed Epistemology.Richard Jonathan Sagar - unknown
Naturalistic Foundations of the Idea of the Holy: Darwinian Roots of Rudolf Otto's Theology.Mladen Turk - 2013 - Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 12 (35):248-263.
Religious Belief is Not Natural. Why Cognitive Science of Religion Does Not Show That Religious Belief is Rational.Hans Van Eyghen - 2016 - Studia Humana 5 (4):34-44.
The Relevance of Hume's Natural History of Religion for Cognitive Science of Religion.Helen De Cruz - 2015 - Res Philosophica 92 (3):653-674.
Religion and Scientism: A Shared Cognitive Conundrum.Matthew Burch - 2016 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 80 (3):225-241.
Religion and the Human Mind: Philosophical Perspectives on the Cognitive Science of Religion.Aku Visala - 2008 - Neue Zeitschrift für Systematicsche Theologie Und Religionsphilosophie 50 (2):109-130.
The Cognitive Science of Religion: Philosophical Observations.Leo Näreaho - 2008 - Religious Studies 44 (1):83-98.
The Cognitive Science of Religion: Implications for Theism?David Leech & Aku Visala - 2011 - Zygon 46 (1):47-64.
The Cognitive Science of Religion: Philosophical Observations: LEO NÄREAHO.Leo N.Äreaho - 2008 - Religious Studies 44 (1):83-98.
Defining “Religion” as Natural: A Critical Invitation to Robert McCauley.Andrew Ali Aghapour - 2014 - Zygon 49 (3):708-715.
How Science and Religion Are More Like Theology and Commonsense Explanations Than They Are Like Each Other: A Cognitive Account.Robert N. McCauley - unknown
Religious Experience, Cognitive Science, and the Future of Religion.Phillip H. Wiebe - 2006 - In Philip Clayton (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Religion and Science. Oxford University Press. pp. 503-522.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Cognitive Science of Religion, Atheism, and Theism.A. Penner Myron - forthcoming - Faith and Philosophy.
Schellenberg’s Hiddenness Argument and its Reversal.Marek Dobrzeniecki & Jacek Wojtysiak - 2022 - Philosophia 50 (4):1687-1705.
References found in this work
In Gods We Trust: The Evolutionary Landscape of Religion.Scott Atran - 2002 - Oup Usa.