Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 12 (3):241-254 (2018)

Yuval Eylon
Open University of Israel
We present and defend a view labeled “practiceism” which provides a solution to the incompatibility problems. The classic incompatibility problem is inconsistency of:1. Someone who intentionally violates the rules of a game is not playing the game.2. In many cases, players intentionally violate the rules as part of playing the game.The problem has a normative counterpart:1’. In normal cases, it is wrong for a player to intentionally violate the rules of the game.2’. In many normal cases, it is not wrong for a player to intentionally violate the rules of the game.According to both formalism and informalism, the rules of the game include the formal rules of the game. Both traditional positions avoid the incompatibility problems by rejecting 1 and 1'. Practiceism rejects 2 and 2’: it maintains that the rules are the rules manifested in playing the game, not the formal rules.Practiceism presents two theses: (...
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2017, 2018
DOI 10.1080/17511321.2017.1334696
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 68,944
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Moral Dimensions: Permissibility, Meaning, Blame.Thomas Scanlon - 2008 - Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Are Rules All an Umpire Has to Work With?J. S. Russell - 1999 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 26 (1):27-49.
The Ethos of Games.Fred D'Agostino - 1981 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 8 (1):7-18.
Broad Internalism, Deep Conventions, Moral Entrepreneurs, and Sport.William J. Morgan - 2012 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 39 (1):65-100.
Intentional Rules Violations—One More Time.Warren P. Fraleigh - 2003 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 30 (2):166-176.

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Conventional Fouls - A Note on Strategic Fouls.Yuval Eylon - 2019 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 14 (2):241-246.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Accounting for Constitutive Rules in Game Theory.Cyril Hédoin - 2015 - Journal of Economic Methodology 22 (4):439-461.
Two Kinds of Games.Filip Kobiela - 2011 - Acta Universitatis Carolinae Kinanthropologica 47 (1):61-67.
Mating Strategies as Game Theory: Changing Rules?Linda Mealey - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):613-613.
Rules, Games, and Society.Martin A. Bertman - 2008 - Abstracta 4 (2):96-122.
What is a Game?Bernard Suits - 1967 - Philosophy of Science 34 (2):148-156.
Game-Players and Game-Playing: A Response to Kreider.Richard Royce - 2013 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 40 (2):225 - 239.
Must We Play to Win? A Reply to Morgan.Maksymilian Del Mar - 2015 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 45 (2):266-272.
Autonomie als voorwaarde tot legaliteit.Pauline Westerman - 2009 - Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy 38 (1):11-16.


Added to PP index

Total views
28 ( #405,466 of 2,498,022 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #102,504 of 2,498,022 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes