In The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy. Charlottesville: Philosophy Doc Ctr. pp. 13-21 (2000)
Taking into account the difficulties that all attempts at a solution of the problem of causal-explanatory exclusion have experienced, we analyze in this paper the chances that mind-body causation is a case of overdetermination, a line of attack that has scarcely been explored. Our conclusion is that claiming that behaviors are causally overdetermined cannot solve the problem of causal-explanatory exclusion. The reason is the problem of massive coincidence, that can only be avoided by establishing a relation between mind and body; that is, by denying overdetermination. The only way to defend that mind-body causation is a case of overdetermination would be by denying any modal force whatever to the principle of the causal closure of the physical, and this is a claim we would not like to reject
|Keywords||Explanation Metaphysics Mind-body|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
Unsolvable Problems, Visual Imagery, and Explanatory Satisfaction.Marc F. Krellenstein - 1995 - Journal of Mind and Behavior 16 (3):235-54.
Other Bodies, Other Minds: A Machine Incarnation of an Old Philosophical Problem. [REVIEW]Stevan Harnad - 1991 - Minds and Machines 1 (1):43-54.
Locke and the Mind-Body Problem: An Interpretation of His Agnosticism.Han-Kyul Kim - 2008 - Philosophy 83 (4):439-458.
Conceptual Changes in Problem of Mind-Body Relation.K. D. Irani - 1980 - In Body & Mind: Past, Present And Future. New York: Academic Press.
The Mind-Body Problem: A Guide to the Current Debate.Richard Warner & Tadeusz Szubka (eds.) - 1994 - Blackwell.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads35 ( #147,590 of 2,171,798 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #326,702 of 2,171,798 )
How can I increase my downloads?