Mapping Decisions and Arguments

Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 30 (2):17-53 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

As a learning tool, argument and decision maps enable students to hone their interpretive and analytical skills. This paper illustrates one effective approach to teaching the diagrammat­ic conventions used in a powerful decision and argument mapping methodology. The twenty example maps included begin with a configuration illustrating one reason offered in support of a conclusion, and build to highly complex maps illustrating the analyses of real world decisions as recorded in interviews and official documents. Using their interpretive and analytical skills, and the simple conventions taught and illustrated here, students and researchers are able to build and to refine maps that show simple arguments, lines of reasoning, unspoken but implicit as­sumptions, pro and con argumentation, individual and group decision making, the influences of reactive cognitive heuristics on decision making, the use of various familiar valid and fallacious inference patterns, and the bolstering phenomenon associated with the use of multiple arguments in support of a given option.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Value Maps in Applied Ethics.Paul Thagard - 2015 - Teaching Ethics 15 (1):115-127.
Argument maps improve critical thinking.Charles Twardy - 2004 - Teaching Philosophy 27 (2):95--116.
Computer-Aided Argument Mapping and the Teaching of Critical Thinking (Part 1).Martin Davies - 2012 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 27 (2):15-30.
Teaching Ethics, Heuristics, and Biases.Robert Prentice - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics Education 1 (1):55-72.
Analyzing Explanations for Seemingly Irrational Choices.Noreen C. Facione & Peter A. Facione - 2001 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 15 (2):267-286.
Looking for a Fight.Kurt Mosser - 2006 - Teaching Philosophy 29 (4):343-362.
Good Moral Judgment and Decision‐Making Without Deliberation.Asia Ferrin - 2017 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 55 (1):68-95.
Looking for a Fight.Kurt Mosser - 2006 - Teaching Philosophy 29 (4):343-362.
Teaching philosophy of science to scientists: why, what and how.Till Grüne-Yanoff - 2014 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 4 (1):115-134.
A Decision Procedure for Evaluating Natural Language Arguments.Moti Mizrahi - 2012 - APA Newsletter on Teaching Philosophy 12 (1):11-12.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-06-15

Downloads
19 (#781,160)

6 months
4 (#800,606)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Thinking, Fast and Slow.Daniel Kahneman - 2011 - New York: New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Argumentation and the Force of Reasons.Robert C. Pinto - 2009 - Informal Logic 29 (3):268-295.
Meaning and Intending.Peter A. Facione - 1973 - American Philosophical Quarterly 10 (4):277 - 287.

Add more references