I'm OK if you're OK: On the notion of trusting communication [Book Review]

Journal of Philosophical Logic 17 (4):329 - 354 (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We consider the issue of what an agent or a processor needs to know in order to know that its messages are true. This may be viewed as a first step to a general theory of cooperative communication in distributed systems. An honest message is one that is known to be true when it is sent (or said). If every message that is sent is honest, then of course every message that is sent is true. Various weaker considerations than honesty are investigated with the property that provided every message sent satisfies the condition, then every message sent is true

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,607

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
76 (#272,654)

6 months
7 (#673,909)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Citations of this work

Guest Editors’ Introduction.James Delgrande & Jérôme Lang - 2015 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 44 (2):111-115.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Outline of a theory of truth.Saul Kripke - 1975 - Journal of Philosophy 72 (19):690-716.
Belief, awareness, and limited reasoning.Ronald Fagin & Joseph Y. Halpern - 1987 - Artificial Intelligence 34 (1):39-76.
Truth and paradox.Anil Gupta - 1982 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 11 (1):1-60.
Truth and Paradox.Anil Gupta - 1981 - Journal of Philosophy 78 (11):735-736.

Add more references