Authors |
|
Abstract |
The aim of the present article is twofold. Firstly, it aims to study the problems arising from the notion of rule proposed by Peter Winch in The Idea of a Social Science and Its Relation to Philosophy to account for all meaningful behavior. On the one hand, it will analyze the problems in the argument posed by Winch in order to state that all meaningful behavior is governed by rules. On the other hand, it will focus on the problems concerning his conception of rules and rule-following, with specific emphasis on pointing out the issues that arise from the criterion posed by Winch in order to determine when a rule is being followed. Secondly, it aims to reassess Winch’s proposal and reformulate, accommodate and define his notion of rule in an intentional account of meaningful behavior, thus solving the problems presented. In addition, it will provide a criterion that allows to determine when a rule is being followed.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | |
DOI | 10.1007/s10838-019-09462-w |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind.John R. Searle - 1983 - Cambridge University Press.
Making the Social World: The Structure of Human Civilization.John R. Searle - 2010 - Oxford University Press UK.
View all 47 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
How to Think About Rules and Rule Following.Karsten R. Stueber - 2005 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 35 (3):307-323.
Rules, Magic and Instrumental Reason a Critical Interpretation of Peter Winch's Philosophy of the Social Sciences.Berel Dov Lerner & Peter Winch - 2002 - Psychology Press.
Philosophical Sociology of Peter Winch.Maciej Soin - 2009 - Archiwum Historii Filozofii I Myśli Społecznej 54.
Social Science as the Idea: Peter Winch and Wittgenstein’s Heritage.Michal Sládecek - 2010 - Filozofija I Društvo 21 (3):145-162.
Rethinking Social Criticism: Rules, Logic and Internal Critique.Stephen Kemp - 2003 - History of the Human Sciences 16 (4):61-84.
Iv. Understanding Peter Winch.W. W. Sharrock & R. J. Anderson - 1985 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 28 (1-4):119 – 122.
There is No Such Thing as Social Science: In Defence of Peter Winch.K. J. Morris - 2009 - Analysis 69 (4):795-797.
There is No Such Thing as Social Science: In Defence of Peter Winch. [REVIEW]Phil Hutchinson, Rupert Read & Wes Sharrock - 2009 - Analysis 69 (4):795-797.
Rules, Technique, and Practical Knowledge: A Wittgensteinian Exploration of Vocational Learning.Christopher Winch - 2006 - Educational Theory 56 (4):407-421.
Faith, Belief and Perspective: Peter Winch's Philosophy of Religion.Eric O. Springsted - 2004 - Philosophical Investigations 27 (4):345-369.
Faith, Belief and Perspective: Peter Winch's Philosophy of Religion.Eric O. Springsted - 2004 - Philosophical Investigations 27 (4):345–369.
Instructions, Rules, and Abstraction: A Misconstrued Relation.Emilio Ribes-Iñesta - 2000 - Behavior and Philosophy 28 (1/2):41 - 55.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2019-06-29
Total views
21 ( #537,260 of 2,519,497 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #407,153 of 2,519,497 )
2019-06-29
Total views
21 ( #537,260 of 2,519,497 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #407,153 of 2,519,497 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads