Manuales de traducción, reinterpretación e indeterminación de la forma lógica

Revista de Filosofía (Madrid) 33 (2):87-110 (2008)
Authors
Abstract
In this paper we compare the thesis of underdetermination of theories with the thesis of indeterminacy of translation. Drawing upon this comparison, we argue that, in the context of Quine’s philosophy, the thesis of indeterminacy of translation can only be maintained if it is taken as establishing an indeterminacy in the logical form of sentences. Consequently, we contend that Quine lacks a solid argument for indeterminacy of translation
Keywords Indeterminación de la traducción  Indeterminacy of translation  W  Indeterminación de la forma lógica   V  Indeterminacy of logical form  Subdeterminación de las teorías  Underdetermination of theories   Quine   O
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2009
DOI -
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 35,445
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-11-03

Total downloads
20 ( #303,856 of 2,285,007 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #389,834 of 2,285,007 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature