A Pascal-type justification of faith in a scientific age

Philosophy 80 (4):543-563 (2005)

Abstract
The author argues that faith survives as a rational option, despite science rendering improbable distinctively theological claims about the world and history. After rejecting justifications of faith from natural theology and natural law, he defends a seemingly weaker strategy, a corrected version of Pascal's wager argument. The wager lets one's desires count toward showing one's faith to be rational, and the faith requires that oneÕs desires undergo radical transformation to protect the faith, making the wager argument really quite strong. As Nietzsche insisted, to be an atheist in the face of this challenge, one would have to become superhuman and transform one's values radically in the opposite direction.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s003181910500046x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 46,179
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Analysis of Faith.Bradley Rettler - 2018 - Philosophy Compass 13 (9):e12517.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Two Caricatures, I: Pascal's Wager.James Franklin - 1998 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 44 (2):109 - 114.
On Rescher on Pascal's Wager.Graham Oppy - 1991 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 30 (3):159 - 168.
Pascal's Wager.Alan Hájek - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
68 ( #128,554 of 2,285,629 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #577,262 of 2,285,629 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature