Purpose, feedback, and evolution

Philosophy of Science 48 (2):198-217 (1981)
This essay develops a theory of natural signs in order to show how evolutionary theory breathes new life into teleology. An argument to the contrary presented by Richard Taylor is refuted. The essay defends the view that the concept of negative feedback explicates purposiveness and that symbiotic evolution explains the occurrence of naturally adapted feedback systems. But evolution itself is not a teleological process, nor is it a negative feedback system. There is an exploration of the nature of the dissatisfaction we feel with an evolutionary account of purposiveness from which the fortuitous cannot be eliminated
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/288991
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 23,674
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Lowell Nissen (1993). Four Ways of Eliminating Mind From Teleology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 24 (1):27-48.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

23 ( #204,602 of 1,903,117 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #446,023 of 1,903,117 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.