Duty to disclose what? Querying the putative obligation to return research results to participants

Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (3):210-213 (2008)

Authors
Franklin Miller
Columbia University
Abstract
Many research ethics guidelines now oblige researchers to offer research participants the results of research in which they participated. This practice is intended to uphold respect for persons and ensure that participants are not treated as mere means to an end. Yet some scholars have begun to question a generalised duty to disclose research results, highlighting the potential harms arising from disclosure and questioning the ethical justification for a duty to disclose, especially with respect to individual results. In support of this view, we argue that current rationales for a duty of disclosure do not form an adequate basis for an ethical imperative. We review policy guidance and scholarly commentary regarding the duty to communicate the results of biomedical, epidemiological and genetic research to research participants and show that there is wide variation in opinion regarding what should be disclosed and under what circumstance. Moreover, we argue that there is fundamental confusion about the notion of “research results,” specifically regarding three core concepts: the distinction between aggregate and individual results, amongst different types of research, and across different degrees of result veracity. Even where policy guidance and scholarly commentary have been most forceful in support of an ethical imperative to disclose research results, ambiguity regarding what is to be disclosed confounds ethical action
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/jme.2006.020289
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 44,474
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Best Laid Plans for Offering Results Go Awry.Lisa S. Parker - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (6):22 – 23.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 20 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A Duty to Participate in Research: Does Social Context Matter?Inmaculada de Melo-Mart - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (10):28 – 36.
Familial Communication of Research Results: A Need to Know?Lee Black & Kelly A. McClellan - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (4):605-613.
The Return of Results of Deceased Research Participants.Anne Marie Tassé - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (4):621-630.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-08-24

Total views
20 ( #438,761 of 2,273,208 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #407,470 of 2,273,208 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature