About Celestial Circulation: Averroes’ Tahafūt al-tahafūt and Aristotle’s De Caelo

Journal of Islamic Philosophy 4:21-38 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

For Averroes, celestial circulation is evidence of a divinely mandated rational universe. This paper follows Averroes’ account on cosmic contact between the eternal and the temporal, in Tahafūt al-tahafūt contra al-Ghazālī. It argues that the polemical perspective of the Tahafūt al-tahafūt frames Averroes’ appeal to Aristotle’s account of cosmic motion. Consequently, Averroes’ exceptional account of the universe contrasts Aristotle’s exemplary account of the mutual participation of intellect and nature. Their accounts of celestial circulation implicate the status of human nature conditioned by cosmic nature. As such, the possibility of human freedom rests on the nature of causality between divine intellect and cosmic manifestation. The convergence and divergence of Aristotle and Averroes regarding celestial circulation reveals Averroes’ politics that guide a rational argument for a strong cosmic causal connection between the unmoved mover and the universe, against al-Ghazālī’s rationally inaccessible divine will

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,594

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Averroes' Tahafut Ak-Tahafut.Beatrice H. Zedler - 1956 - Modern Schoolman 33 (2):124-127.
Averroës' Tahafut AI-Tahafut.Christopher M. Lerner - 1957 - New Scholasticism 31 (1):117-120.
Averroes and the Teleological Argument.Taneli Kukkonen - 2002 - Religious Studies 38 (4):405-428.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-02

Downloads
54 (#216,302)

6 months
2 (#278,494)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references