Res Publica 9 (3):243-256 (2003)

Colin Farrelly
Queen's University
Those who subscribe to a prudential conception of practical reason do not believe that there is a conflict between other-regarding and self-regarding norms as the former are held to be founded on the latter. Moral conduct, they maintain, is always rationally justifiable. The reasons we should fulfil the demands of other-regarding norms are the same as those we have for fulfilling self-regarding norms. David Brink has put forth an interesting and novel account of this approach to practical reason which he calls ‘metaphysical egoism’. Metaphysical egoism requires that we modify our pre-theoretical understandings of self-interest on metaphysical grounds. I critically assess Brink’s argument and claim that metaphysical egoism does not adequately function as a motive or guide for action. It is susceptible to many of the same problems which strategic egoism faces.
Keywords Aristotle  egoism  eudaimonia  Green  guide  morality  motive  Plato  reciprocity thesis
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2004
DOI 10.1023/A:1026276023091
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 57,199
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
128 ( #76,235 of 2,411,838 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #244,282 of 2,411,838 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes