Bioethics 24 (8):384-394 (2010)
Where does the aspiration to retard human ageing fit in the ‘big picture’ of medical necessities and the requirements of just healthcare? Is there a duty to retard human ageing? And if so, how much should we invest in the basic science that studies the biology of ageing and could lead to interventions that modify the biological processes of human ageing? I consider two prominent accounts of equality and just healthcare – Norman Daniels's application of the principle of fair equality of opportunity and Ronald Dworkin's account of equality of resources – and conclude that, once suitably amended and revised, both actually support the conclusion that anti-ageing research is important and could lead to interventions that ought to be considered ‘medical necessities’
|Keywords||equality disease justice ageing|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
In Defense of Ectogenesis.Anna Smajdor - 2012 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 21 (01):90-103.
Empirical Ethics and the Duty to Extend the “Biological Warranty Period”.Colin Farrelly - 2013 - Social Philosophy and Policy 30 (1-2):480-503.
Similar books and articles
Aging Research: Priorities and Aggregation.Colin Farrelly - 2008 - Public Health Ethics 1 (3):258-267.
Basic Equality.Jeremy Waldron - 2008 - Nyu School of Law, Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper Series Working Paper 8 (61).
Ageing and Human Nature.Michael Bavidge - 2006 - In Julian C. Hughes, Stephen J. Louw & Steven R. Sabat (eds.), Dementia: Mind, Meaning, and the Person. Oxford University Press.
The Right and Wrong of Growing Old: Assessing the Argument From Evolution.Bennett Foddy - 2012 - Philosophy and Technology 25 (4):547-560.
Added to index2009-02-17
Total downloads27 ( #190,161 of 2,171,986 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #326,556 of 2,171,986 )
How can I increase my downloads?