Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (6):587-592 (2004)

Authors
Colin Farrelly
Queen's University
Abstract
What we think about equality as a value will influence how we think genetic interventions should be regulated. In this paper I utilise the taxonomy of equality put forth by Derek Parfit and apply this to the issue of genetic interventions. I argue that Telic Egalitarianism is untenable and that Deontic Egalitarianism collapses into the Priority View. The Priority View maintains that it is morally more important to benefit those who are worse off. Once this precision has been given to the concerns egalitarians have a number of diverse issues must be considered before determining what the just regulation of genetic interventions would be. Consideration must be given to the current situation of the current situation of the least advantaged, the fiscal realities behind genetic interventions, the budget constraints on other programmes egalitarians believe should receive scarce public funds and the interconnected nature of genetic information. These considerations might lead egalitarians to abandon what they take to be the obvious policy recommendations for them to endorse regarding the regulation of genetic therapies and enhancements.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/jme.2002.002329
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 57,041
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Luck, Genes, and Equality.Dov Fox - 2007 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 35 (4):712-726.
Genomics and Equal Opportunity Ethics.A. W. Cappelen, O. F. Norheim & B. Tungodden - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (5):361-364.
Luck, Genes, and Equality.Dov Fox - 2007 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 35 (4):712-726.
Enhancement and Equality.Greg Bognar - 2012 - Ethical Perspectives 19 (1):11-32.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Virtue Ethics and Prenatal Genetic Enhancement.Colin Farrelly - 2007 - Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology 1 (1).
Luck, Genes, and Equality.Dov Fox - 2007 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 35 (4):712-726.
The Nature and Significance of Behavioural Genetic Information.Ainsley Newson - 2004 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (2):89-111.
Equality, Priority and Person-Affecting Value.Ingmar Persson - 2001 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 4 (1):23-39.
Ethics and Eugenic Enhancement.Michael Selgelid - 2003 - Poiesis and Praxis 1 (4):239-261.
Equality.Louis P. Pojman - 1999 - Journal of Philosophical Research 24:193-245.
The Genetic Difference Principle.Colin Farrelly - 2004 - American Journal of Bioethics 4 (2):21 – 28.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
42 ( #240,380 of 2,410,861 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #538,938 of 2,410,861 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes