Archive for Mathematical Logic 51 (7-8):695-707 (2012)

Authors
Hiroakira Ono
Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology
Abstract
Along the same line as that in Ono (Ann Pure Appl Logic 161:246–250, 2009), a proof-theoretic approach to Glivenko theorems is developed here for substructural predicate logics relative not only to classical predicate logic but also to arbitrary involutive substructural predicate logics over intuitionistic linear predicate logic without exponentials QFL e . It is shown that there exists the weakest logic over QFL e among substructural predicate logics for which the Glivenko theorem holds. Negative translations of substructural predicate logics are studied by using the same approach. First, a negative translation, called extended Kuroda translation is introduced. Then a translation result of an arbitrary involutive substructural predicate logics over QFL e is shown, and the existence of the weakest logic is proved among such logics for which the extended Kuroda translation works. They are obtained by a slight modification of the proof of the Glivenko theorem. Relations of our extended Kuroda translation with other standard negative translations will be discussed. Lastly, algebraic aspects of these results will be mentioned briefly. In this way, a clear and comprehensive understanding of Glivenko theorems and negative translations will be obtained from a substructural viewpoint
Keywords Glivenko’s theorem  Negative translations  Double negation shift  Substructural predicate logics  Proof-theoretic methods
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s00153-012-0293-8
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,682
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Shoenfield is Gödel After Krivine.Thomas Streicher & Ulrich Kohlenbach - 2007 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 53 (2):176-179.
Glivenko Theorems for Substructural Logics Over FL.Nikolaos Galatos & Hiroakira Ono - 2006 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 71 (4):1353 - 1384.
Glivenko Theorems Revisited.Hiroakira Ono - 2009 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 161 (2):246-250.
Applications of Trees to Intermediate Logics.Dov M. Gabbay - 1972 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 37 (1):135-138.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Glivenko Theorems for Substructural Logics Over FL.Nikolaos Galatos & Hiroakira Ono - 2006 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 71 (4):1353 - 1384.
Modal Translations in Substructural Logics.Kosta Došen - 1992 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 21 (3):283 - 336.
Substructural Logics.Greg Restall - forthcoming - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Metacompleteness of Substructural Logics.Takahiro Seki - 2012 - Studia Logica 100 (6):1175-1199.
Kripke Semantics for Modal Substructural Logics.Norihiro Kamide - 2002 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 11 (4):453-470.
Normal Modal Substructural Logics with Strong Negation.Norihiro Kamide - 2003 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 32 (6):589-612.
Deduction Theorems for Weak Implicational Logics.M. W. Bunder - 1982 - Studia Logica 41 (2-3):95 - 108.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-10-27

Total views
35 ( #280,171 of 2,349,382 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #510,581 of 2,349,382 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes