Myths and Legends: An Examination of the Historical Role of the Accused in Traditional Legal Scholarship; a Look at the 19th Century
Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 21 (2):331-353 (2001)
This article explores and questions traditional legal scholarship's historical presentation of the role of the accused and the relationship between the individual and the state in English criminal justice that it expresses. This perceived relationship between the individual and the state is traced through a textual and historical analysis of rules relating to questioning and to confessions. The article focuses on the ‘development’ of these rules during the 19th century when the foundations of the modern English legal system were laid. The author maintains that through the conceptual categories of ‘subject’, ‘citizen’ and ‘suspect’, established legal writers have constructed the role played by the accused within an historical framework of ‘progress’. Yet when examined in the light of case law and statute from the period, that framework appears more mythical than factual as it lacks the evidential foundation to support it
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Two Constitutionalisms in Europe: Pursuing an Articulation of the European and International Legal Orders.Jean D'Aspremont & Frédéric Dopagne - unknown
The Right to an Impartial Hearing Trumps the Social Imperative of Bringing Accused to Trial Even 'Down Under'.Mirko Bagaric - 2010 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 4 (3):321-339.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads6 ( #550,199 of 2,152,486 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #399,782 of 2,152,486 )
How can I increase my downloads?