The error theory has, for some time, served as a last resort for those who would like to take moral realism seriously but who cannot countenance the thought that moral properties might be non-natural. As soon as their attempts to ‘square' moral properties with natural properties appear to be in trouble, such philosophers resort to the line that the error theory is true. But the error theory trades mostly upon Mackie's influential argument from queerness. Here I attempt two main things. First I argue that the relation at which Mackie's queerness argument is best directed is that of something's being a reason for something else. Second, I argue that error theorists had best back off from the queerness argument since, if sound, it implies that there are not even any reasons for belief: and therefore no reasons to believe the error theory itself. S. Afr. J. Philos. Vol.24(1) 2005: 1-13
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.4314/sajpem.v24i1.31409
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,018
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Beyond the Error Theory.Michael Smith - 2010 - In Richard Joyce & Simon Kirchin (eds.), A World Without Values. Springer.
How to Be an Error Theorist About Morality.Simon Robertson - 2008 - Polish Journal of Philosophy 2 (2):107-125.
Evolution and Error Theory.John Mizzoni - 2010 - Social Science Information 49 (2):165-194.
Moral Error Theory and the Argument From Epistemic Reasons.Richard Rowland - 2012 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 7 (1):1-24.
Mackie's Motivational Argument.Philip Clark - 2009 - In David Sobel & Steven Wall (ed.), Reasons for Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Errors Upon Errors: A Reply to Joyce.Stephen Finlay - 2011 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (3):535 - 547.
The Error In 'The Error In The Error Theory'.Richard Joyce - 2011 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (3):519-534.


Added to PP index

Total views
34 ( #280,116 of 2,324,058 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #688,650 of 2,324,058 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes