Ethics and International Affairs 22 (4):357-367 (2008)

Abstract
Building on case studies of Wikipedia and the Daily Kos, this essay argues that different kinds of rules shape relations between members of the majority and of the minority in these communities in important and consequential ways.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1747-7093.2008.00171.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 51,232
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Institutions and Majority Rule in Online Communities.Henry Farrell & Melissa Schwartzberg - 2008 - Ethics and International Affairs 22 (4):357-368.
Choice, Norms and Revealed Preference.N. Baigent - 2007 - Analyse & Kritik 29 (2):139-145.
On State, Identity and Rights: Putting Identity First.Jovan Babić - 2012 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 25 (2):197-209.
15 Associative Democracy and Minorities Within Minorities.Veit Bader - 2005 - In Avigail Eisenberg & Jeff Spinner-Halev (eds.), Minorities Within Minorities: Equality, Rights and Diversity. Cambridge University Press. pp. 319.
The Concept and Legal Personality of National Minorities in International Law.Saulius Katuoka - 2012 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 19 (3):1187-1199.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
13 ( #680,860 of 2,329,884 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #81,642 of 2,329,884 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes