Perichoresis 15 (3):97-110 (2017)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
The doctrine of the atonement is a subject of perpetual curiosity for a number of contemporary theologians. The penal substitution theory of atonement in particular has precipitated a great deal of recent interest, being held up by many Protestants as ‘the’ doctrine of atonement. In this essay, we make a defense against the objection to the Anselmian theory of atonement that is often leveled against it by exponents of the Penal Substitution theory, namely, that Christ’s work does not accomplish anything for those whom it appears he undertakes his atoning work, but merely makes provision for salvation.
|
Keywords | Anselm atonement mechanism substitution sufficiency-efficiency |
Categories |
No categories specified (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1515/perc-2017-0018 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Atonement, Law, and Justice: The Cross in Historical and Cultural Contexts.[author unknown] - 2014
Deviant Calvinism: Broadening Reformed Theology.[author unknown] - 2014
Citations of this work BETA
Approaching Participation in the Divine Gift: Anselm of Canterbury’s Theology of the Holy Spirit.T. Parker Haratine - 2019 - Heythrop Journal.
Similar books and articles
Swinburnian Atonement and the Doctrine of Penal Substitution.Steven L. Porter - 2004 - Faith and Philosophy 21 (2):228-241.
Original Sin and Atonement.Oliver D. Crisp - 2008 - In Thomas P. Flint & Michael C. Rea (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Theology. Oxford University Press.
Atonement and the Concept of Punishment.Daniel J. Hill & Joseph Jedwab - 2015 - In Oliver D. Crisp & Fred Sanders (eds.), Locating Atonement. Zondervan. pp. 139-153.
Christian Atonement and Kantian Justification.Philip L. Quinn - 1986 - Faith and Philosophy 3 (4):440-462.
The Interpretation of Anselm's Teaching on Christ's Satisfaction for Sin in the Franciscan Tradition From Alexander of Hales to Duns Scotus.Andrew Rosato - 2013 - Franciscan Studies 71:411-444.
Punishing and Atoning: A New Critique of Penal Substitution.Brent G. Kyle - 2013 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 74 (2):201-218.
Anselm on Atonement.David Brown - 2004 - In Brian Leftow (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Anselm. Cambridge University Press.
An Anselmian Theory of Atonement: A Defense of Elements of Anselm's "Cur Deus Homo".Steven Scott Aspenson - 1996 - Dissertation, The University of Iowa
The Mystery of Atonement and Swinburne's Reparation Theory.Alexander Hyun - 2015 - Religious Studies:1-9.
Christ Our Brother: Family Unity in Anselm’s Theory of the Atonement.Katherin A. Rogers - 2012 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 86 (2):223-236.
Swinburne on Atonement: STEVEN S. ASPENSON.Steven S. Aspenson - 1996 - Religious Studies 32 (2):187-204.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2017-11-22
Total views
11 ( #803,230 of 2,420,544 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #542,979 of 2,420,544 )
2017-11-22
Total views
11 ( #803,230 of 2,420,544 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #542,979 of 2,420,544 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads