Perichoresis 15 (3):97-110 (2017)

Authors
Joshua Farris
Houston Baptist University
Abstract
The doctrine of the atonement is a subject of perpetual curiosity for a number of contemporary theologians. The penal substitution theory of atonement in particular has precipitated a great deal of recent interest, being held up by many Protestants as ‘the’ doctrine of atonement. In this essay, we make a defense against the objection to the Anselmian theory of atonement that is often leveled against it by exponents of the Penal Substitution theory, namely, that Christ’s work does not accomplish anything for those whom it appears he undertakes his atoning work, but merely makes provision for salvation.
Keywords Anselm  atonement  mechanism  substitution  sufficiency-efficiency
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1515/perc-2017-0018
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,398
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Communal Substitutionary Atonement.Joshua Thurow - 2015 - Journal of Analytic Theology 3:47-69.
Original Sin and Atonement.Oliver D. Crisp - 2008 - In Thomas P. Flint & Michael C. Rea (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Theology. Oxford University Press.
Atonement and the Concept of Punishment.Daniel J. Hill & Joseph Jedwab - 2015 - In Oliver D. Crisp & Fred Sanders (eds.), Locating Atonement. Zondervan. pp. 139-153.
Christian Atonement and Kantian Justification.Philip L. Quinn - 1986 - Faith and Philosophy 3 (4):440-462.
Punishing and Atoning: A New Critique of Penal Substitution.Brent G. Kyle - 2013 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 74 (2):201-218.
Anselm on Atonement.David Brown - 2004 - In Brian Leftow (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Anselm. Cambridge University Press.
Christ Our Brother: Family Unity in Anselm’s Theory of the Atonement.Katherin A. Rogers - 2012 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 86 (2):223-236.
Do We Believe in Penal Substitution?David K. Lewis - 1997 - Philosophical Papers 26 (3):203 - 209.
Swinburne on Atonement.Steven S. Aspenson - 1996 - Religious Studies 32 (2):187 - 204.
Swinburne on Atonement: STEVEN S. ASPENSON.Steven S. Aspenson - 1996 - Religious Studies 32 (2):187-204.
Inclusivism and the Atonement.Bruce R. Reichenbach - 1999 - Faith and Philosophy 16 (1):43-54.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-11-22

Total views
11 ( #803,230 of 2,420,544 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #542,979 of 2,420,544 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes