American Journal of Bioethics 4 (2):21 – 28 (2004)
In the newly emerging debates about genetics and justice three distinct principles have begun to emerge concerning what the distributive aim of genetic interventions should be. These principles are: genetic equality, a genetic decent minimum, and the genetic difference principle. In this paper, I examine the rationale of each of these principles and argue that genetic equality and a genetic decent minimum are ill-equipped to tackle what I call the currency problem and the problem of weight. The genetic difference principle is the most promising of the three principles and I develop this principle so that it takes seriously the concerns of just health care and distributive justice in general. Given the strains on public funds for other important social programmes, the costs of pursuing genetic interventions and the nature of genetic interventions, I conclude that a more lax interpretation of the genetic difference principle is appropriate. This interpretation stipulates that genetic inequalities should be arranged so that they are to the greatest reasonable benefit of the least advantaged. Such a proposal is consistent with prioritarianism and provides some practical guidance for non-ideal societies–that is, societies that do not have the endless amount of resources needed to satisfy every requirement of justice.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Parental Planning and New Reproductive Technologies.Oliver Feeney - 2011 - Res Publica 17 (3):303-309.
Similar books and articles
The Social Construction of Genetic Abnormality: Ethical Implications for Managerial Decisions in the Workplace. [REVIEW]Alan Strudler - 1994 - Journal of Business Ethics 13 (11):839 - 848.
Are Genetic Self-Tests Dangerous? Assessing the Commercialization of Genetic Testing in Terms of Personal Autonomy.Ludvig Beckman - 2004 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (5-6):387-398.
Reassessing Insurers' Access to Genetic Information: Genetic Privacy, Ignorance, and Injustice.Eli Feiring - 2009 - Bioethics 23 (5):300-310.
Human Genes and Neoliberal Governance: A Foucauldian Critique.Antoinette Rouvroy - 2008 - Routledge-Cavendish.
Genetic Justice Must Track Genetic Complexity.Colin Farrelly - 2007 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 17 (1):45-53.
Equality of Whom? A Genetic Perspective on Equality (of Opportunity).Oliver Feeney - 2006 - Res Publica 12 (4):357-383.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads40 ( #129,904 of 2,171,820 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #173,716 of 2,171,820 )
How can I increase my downloads?