Criminal Law and Philosophy 9 (1):1-20 (2015)
Some philosophers believe that punishing convicted criminals in order to deter other, potential criminals would be morally questionable even if we had good evidence that doing so would achieve its goal, at least to a substantial degree. And they believe this because they believe that doing so would be an instance of “using” convicted criminals in a morally objectionable way. Tadros aims to show that we would indeed be “using” convicted criminals in such cases but that, while “using” others is ordinarily morally wrong, there are cases in which it is in fact morally permissible . Moreover, he claims that punishing convicted criminals in order to deter other, potential criminals is an instance of “using” others that is sometimes clearly morally justifiable. My aim is to show how extraordinarily interesting some of Tadros’ arguments are but also why, in my view, they fail to establish the view he claims they support. I also suggest some ways in which Tadros might revise his arguments to support his central claim more effectively
|Keywords||Self-defense Self-defense and punishment General deterrence|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
The Ends of Harm: The Moral Foundations of Criminal Law.Victor Tadros - 2011 - Oxford University Press.
Deterrence and the Just Distribution of Harm.Daniel M. Farrell - 1995 - Social Philosophy and Policy 12 (2):220-240.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
‘To Serve and Protect’: The Ends of Harm by Victor Tadros. [REVIEW]Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen - 2015 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 9 (1):49-71.
Victor's Justice: The Next Best Moral Theory of Criminal Punishment? [REVIEW]François Tanguay-Renaud - 2013 - Law and Philosophy 32 (1):129-157.
Retributivism: The Right and the Good. [REVIEW]Adil Ahmad Haque - 2013 - Law and Philosophy 32 (1):59-82.
An Examination of a Moral Argument Against Nuclear Deterrence.Robert McKim - 1985 - Journal of Religious Ethics 13 (2):279 - 297.
The Instruments of Abolition, or Why Retributivism is the Only Real Justification of Punishment.Leo Zaibert - 2013 - Law and Philosophy 32 (1):33-58.
Ii. On Retributivism and Deterrence.Gertrude Ezorsky - 1978 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 21 (1-4):103 – 104.
Terrorism, Self-Defense, and the Killing of the Innocent.Whitley R. P. Kaufman - 2004 - Social Philosophy Today 20:41-52.
Self-Defense, Punishing Unjust Combatants and Justice in War.Steve Viner - 2010 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 4 (3):297-319.
What Should We Say We Say About Contrived 'Self-Defense' Defenses?Daniel M. Farrell - 2013 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 7 (3):571-585.
Added to index2012-12-09
Total downloads23 ( #221,205 of 2,178,142 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #166,129 of 2,178,142 )
How can I increase my downloads?