Authors
Colin Farrelly
Queen's University
Abstract
In this paper I argue that the virtue ethics tradition can enhance the moral discourse on the ethics of prenatal genetic enhancements in distinctive and valuable ways. Virtue ethics prescribes we adopt a much more provisional stance on the issue of the moral permissibility of prenatal genetic enhancements. A stance that places great care on differentiating between the different stakes involved with developing different phenotypes in our children and the different possible means (environmental vs. genetic manipulation) available to parents for pursuing legitimate concerns of parental love and virtue. Key components of the virtue ethics account of morality, such as the Aristotelian account of happiness, love and the doctrine of the mean, provide an adequate basis for rejecting the claim that it is morally impermissible for parents to pursue (safe and effective) prenatal enhancements. Furthermore, there is good reason to believe that a virtue ethics account of morality could actually support the stronger claim that utilising such interventions can (in certain contexts) be morally required
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2202/1941-6008.1016
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 55,935
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

A Not‐So‐New Eugenics.Robert Sparrow - 2011 - Hastings Center Report 41 (1):32-42.
A Confucian Reflection on Genetic Enhancement.Ruiping Fan - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (4):62 – 70.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Genetic Enhancement and Parental Obligation.Larry A. Herzberg - 2007 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 14 (2):98-111.
Virtue Ethics and Virtue Epistemology.Roger Crisp - 2010 - Metaphilosophy 41 (1-2):22-40.
Ethics and Eugenic Enhancement.Michael Selgelid - 2003 - Poiesis and Praxis 1 (4):239-261.
Virtue Ethics.Roger Crisp & Michael Slote (eds.) - 1997 - Oxford University Press.
Choosing Disabilities and Enhancements in Children: A Choice Too Far?Timothy F. Murphy - 2009 - Reproductie Biomedicine Online 2009 (18 sup. 1):43-49.
Germ-Line Genetic Enhancement and Rawlsian Primary Goods.Fritz Allhoff - 2005 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 15 (1):39-56.
An Aristotelian Account of Virtue Ethics: An Essay in Moral Taxonomy.Sean McAleer - 2007 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 88 (2):208–225.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-09-10

Total views
122 ( #79,067 of 2,403,023 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #257,414 of 2,403,023 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes